Just recently
Recently, a wave of "resurrection" of deceased stars has intensified, whether it is Coco Li, Qiao Renliang or Gao Yixiang, their figures have reappeared in the public eye under the magic of AI technology. However, this seemingly miraculous act has sparked widespread controversy.
Qiao Renliang's father stood up and spoke out, saying that he could not accept this "resurrection", feeling that it was disrespectful to the deceased, as if he was uncovering the scars that had healed. His voice was full of helplessness and dissatisfaction, hoping that this behavior would stop as soon as possible.
In fact, judging from previous cases, it is not the first time that the act of resurrecting relatives or celebrities is not the first time. Bao Xiaobai's resurrection of his daughter is out of strong emotional needs, and this kind of private customization is understandable. But controversy ensued when AI technology was used to resurrect public figures. After all, the portrait rights of public figures are also protected by law, and unauthorized use without consent is undoubtedly an infringement of their rights and interests.
What's even more worrying is that some bloggers use AI technology to "resurrect" deceased stars under the banner of warmth, but they are actually carrying out commercial promotion and paid services. This behavior not only consumes the deceased, but can also cause harm to the living. Because everyone feels differently, we can't be sure whether this "resurrection" will bring comfort or hurt.
In this matter, we should leave the choice to the family closest to the deceased. As Qiao Renliang's father said, they are the ones who are most qualified to decide whether to "resurrect" their loved ones. And we, as outsiders, have no right to make decisions without their consent.
In addition, we also need to think about a question: those celebrities who have passed away, do they themselves want to be resurrected? Perhaps in the near future, people can make relevant wills and become accustomed to "resurrection". However, in the current "transition period", we need to maintain self-control and sensitivity to rights, and respect the wishes of the deceased and the choices of their families.
In this era of rapid changes in AI technology, we should be cautious and respectful. There is no such thing as good or evil technology, it's all about how we use it. While pursuing technological innovation, we cannot ignore the existence of laws and regulations and public order and good customs. For the behavior of "resurrecting" deceased stars, we should maintain a cautious attitude and avoid blindly following the trend and disorderly development.
In conclusion, I would like to say that birth, old age, sickness and death are natural laws and facts that we cannot change. Accepting the "resurrection" may be more difficult than accepting death. Therefore, in the early stages of the application of new technologies, we should maintain a sense of reverence and guard the boundaries of law and morality. Only in this way can we find a balance and harmony in this era of symbiosis with AI.
Recently, the phenomenon of using AI technology to "resurrect" deceased celebrities has quietly emerged, but this act has not only caused a lot of controversy, but also touched on many ethical and legal issues. From Qiao Renliang's father's resolute opposition, we can see the discomfort and distress caused by this behavior to the family of the deceased.
Although some people use AI technology to resurrect their loved ones through AI technology, such as Bao Xiaobai's resurrection of his daughter, this behavior may be understandable in the private sphere. However, when AI technology is misused to resurrect public figures and commercialize, the nature of the problem changes radically.
We must be soberly aware that any unauthorized use of the portrait without the consent of the portrait rights holder is a serious infringement of his rights and interests. Mainland law has clear provisions on this, protecting the portrait rights of the deceased, and their families have the right to protect their rights and interests in accordance with the law.
It is worth noting that some bloggers claim that they resurrected the star at the request of fans and did not use it for commercial purposes, so there is no legal risk. This notion is patently wrong. Even if it is not directly used for commercial purposes, resurrecting others without permission is disrespectful to the deceased and their families, and may cause them secondary harm.
In addition, we should also think deeply about a question: those celebrities who have passed away, are they willing to be resurrected? Under the current level of technology, we may not know their true intentions, but this does not mean that we can infringe on their rights and interests at will.
In this era of rapid AI technology, we must embrace the convenience and novelty brought by technology, while maintaining a sense of reverence for law and ethics. For the behavior of "resurrecting" deceased stars, we should be cautious and rational to avoid blindly following the trend and disorderly development.
At the same time, we should also respect the wishes and choices of the deceased and their families, and give them enough space and respect. On this issue, we should keep a sober mind and a prudent attitude, and work together to create a harmonious and civilized social environment.
Recently, there has been a trend in society to use AI technology to "recreate" deceased stars, which has not only set off waves in public opinion, but also touched the red line of ethics and law. Qiao Renliang's father's unequivocal opposition reveals the deep hurt and discomfort of this behavior to the family of the deceased.
Although in certain situations, such as family members out of emotional needs, it may be possible to get some understanding through AI technology to "say goodbye" to their loved ones. However, when this technique is misused for commercial purposes, especially when it involves public figures, its nature changes qualitatively.
We need to recognise that any form of likeness use should be based on the explicit consent of the person concerned. In the case of the deceased, this right is naturally inherited by the family members. This is clearly stipulated in the laws of the mainland and is intended to protect the dignity of the deceased and the rights and interests of the family.
Some bloggers may believe that as long as there is no direct profit, it does not constitute infringement. But this perception ignores a more important dimension: respect for the deceased and their families. Even if there is no direct economic benefit, "resurrecting" others without authorization is a violation of the dignity of the deceased, which may cause irreparable harm to the family.
More importantly, do we have the right to decide whether or not deceased celebrities are willing to be "resurrected"? In the current technological context, we may not know what they really think, but that doesn't mean we can act recklessly.
In the face of the rapid development of AI technology, we must not only appreciate the novelty and convenience it brings, but also maintain a reverence for ethics and the law at all times. For the act of "resurrecting" deceased stars, we should maintain a sober and rational attitude to avoid them from getting out of control.
At the same time, we should also respect the stories and choices of every life, and give the deceased and their families enough respect and space. Only in this way can we maintain a harmonious and civilized social order while enjoying the dividends brought by science and technology.
Recently, there has been a trend in society to use AI technology to "recreate" deceased stars, which has not only caused widespread controversy, but also touched the bottom line of ethics and law. Qiao Renliang's father's explicit opposition profoundly reflects the strong harm and discomfort caused by this behavior to the family of the deceased.
While in individual cases, family members may choose to "see" their loved ones again through AI technology out of emotional needs, this does not mean that this behavior can be abused. Especially when it comes to public figures, any form of unauthorized use is a serious violation of the rights and interests of the deceased and his family.
We must be soberly aware that the right of portraiture is a sacrosanct right, both for living and deceased people. This is clearly stipulated in the laws of the mainland and is aimed at protecting the dignity and rights of every person. Therefore, any unauthorized act of AI "resurrection" is illegal and disrespectful to the deceased and their families.
In addition, we need to think deeply about a more fundamental question: those celebrities who have passed away, are they willing to be "resurrected"? In the current technological context, we may not know what they really think, but this does not mean that we can make decisions for them at will.
In the face of the rapid development of AI technology, we must not only appreciate the convenience and novelty it brings, but also maintain a sense of reverence for ethics and law at all times. For the act of "resurrecting" deceased celebrities, we should maintain a calm and rational attitude to avoid them from getting out of control.
At the same time, we should also respect the stories and choices of every life, and give the deceased and their families enough respect and space. Only in this way can we maintain a harmonious and civilized social environment while enjoying the dividends brought by science and technology.
Recently, a trend of using AI technology to "recreate" deceased celebrities has quietly emerged, which has not only attracted widespread attention from public opinion, but also touched on the sensitive areas of ethics and law. Qiao Renliang's father's resolute opposition undoubtedly reveals the deep harm that this kind of behavior has done to the family of the deceased.
Although in some special situations, family members may want to "see" their loved ones again with the help of AI technology out of emotional needs, this is not a reason to abuse this technology. Especially when it comes to public figures, any unauthorized AI "resurrection" is a serious violation of the rights and interests of the deceased and their families.
We must be clear that the right of portraiture is a sacrosanct right, both for living and deceased persons. This is clearly stipulated in the laws of the mainland and is aimed at protecting the dignity and rights of every person. Any unauthorized use is illegal and disrespectful to the deceased and their families.
In addition, we also need to reflect deeply: those celebrities who have passed away, do they really want to be "resurrected"? In the current technological background, we may not know what they really think, but this does not mean that we can make decisions for them at will.
In the face of the rapid development of AI technology, we must not only appreciate the convenience and novelty it brings, but also maintain a sense of reverence for ethics and the law at all times. For the act of "resurrecting" deceased stars, we should maintain a calm and rational attitude to avoid them from getting out of control.
At the same time, we should also respect the stories and choices of every life, and give the deceased and their families enough respect and space. Only in this way can we enjoy the convenience brought by science and technology, and at the same time maintain a harmonious and civilized social order, so that every life can be respected and tranquil as it deserves.
Thank you for your support, I'm a novice, I like my friends, you can add a follow
