The lack of stamina of private junior high school students is not how private junior high schools overdraw students' potential, but the teaching mode of private schools, which promotes students with a high level of general high school to key high schools, and students at the level of ordinary classes in key high schools to key high school key classes, and their performance in admission is lower than the actual ability, rather than reducing the thinking level of students.
Suppose that 30 students with the level of key high schools enter private junior high schools, 10 ordinary public schools, and 10 township schools, but in the end, 15 students are promoted to key high schools in private schools, and the students with corresponding strength are certainly ashore, and the other 5 students who do not have the corresponding ability level also go ashore, while the ordinary public junior high schools are still ten, and the township junior high schools are only 5 people.
That is to say, half of the students in the township junior high school who could have gone to the key high school are occupied, and the six to ten students in the township junior high school who originally reached the line were eliminated, and the eleven to fifteen students who were not up to the line in the private junior high school went ashore and were promoted to the five students in the township junior high school in the key high school, which is equivalent to the top five among the fifteen students in the private junior high school.
Although the number of students going on to junior high school in townships is smaller, the average level is also higher, and the average level of students in private junior high schools is even lower. This can also understand why there is a policy of index students in the recruitment of middle schools, and the admission rate of township middle schools can be balanced because of the gap in teaching level, and the possibility of more potential students going ashore can be increased.
Private junior high schools have greater disciplinary power than public junior high schools to improve their grades, reflecting factors such as campus management, positive incentives and teaching models, which can make students more engaged in learning, and the learning atmosphere is stronger because the students are at a higher level all day long.
In terms of positive incentives and teaching mode, private junior high schools directly reward excellent students, which greatly improves the competitiveness of students, and the teaching progress is also biased towards the improvement of excellent students, while public junior high schools can not be too motivating to improve the quality of students and parents, and cannot increase the depth of learning for the improvement of good students.