A service area in Inner Mongolia rushed to the hot search two days ago because of a short video, but it didn't take long for it to be reversed immediately, and finally, as some netizens concluded, "Teacher Zhang Xuefeng scored again"
The whole course of the incident
Now it seems that the original author's video can't be found anymore, and for what reason I can't find it, we won't discuss it here.
Judging from the screenshot of this netizen, the original author of the original video actually wrote very clearly "staged a cake cutting door", which obviously described his feelings of shopping in this service area, and later wrote "Remind everyone, do not buy these precious medicinal materials and jewelry in the service area or tourist attractions".
Publisher "User 814778973925" explains:
"I didn't express it clearly, I just used the cake cutting door to make an analogy, in fact, he was selling medicinal wine, and the customer was fooled by the trust next to him to buy the precious medicinal herbs that the merchant said was soaked in wine, and the price of the so-called precious medicinal materials was more than 12,000. ”
However, the topic created by the Blue V account that first published the news was "A service area in Inner Mongolia cut a cake and cut out 10,002 and sold it by grams".
I don't know if the staff in charge didn't notice the word, or some other reason, anyway, the news released by the blue V account directly sparked heated discussions among netizens.
Data on the topic of "one door, two eats".
From the data, it can be seen that the direct reading of this topic is close to 100 million, the number of discussions is 18,000, and the number of interactions is 123,000, and the hot search ranks first.
Then, this event can be said to be the follow-up development that we should all be accustomed to - "reversal".
The follow-up of the 12,000 cake-cutting incident in Inner Mongolia - this topic is amazing, in the case of the highest hot search only ranking second, the number of reads has reached 110 million, there are 11,000 discussions, and 56,000 interactions.
Therefore, there is no need to carefully verify the topic that can trigger public opinion, and then there is another reversal, this positive and negative, the number of readings adds up to 200 million, do you say that as a blue V account, is this "one door and two eats" to win hemp?
The most important thing is that even if you don't say which service area is specific, and you don't say the specific time of this video, there is basically no verification and the news that is released directly does not need to be blamed.
It's this kind of person who bears all this
In fact, there are really a lot of such reversals every day, some of which are indeed unexpected, and some of them are really just to grab traffic and will not care about others.
As a netizen, what I watch every day is this kind of news, I eat a lot of melons, and netizens who know how to think more are better, and now I basically won't be bothered by this kind of news that reverses back and forth every day, but those netizens who don't like to think more and think that the blue V hair is definitely correct are very troubled.
These netizens will feel that they have been tricked and deceived, how can this be?
Especially those who start to vent their emotions directly as soon as they see the headline, when they know the truth of the matter, there is no catharsis point for this kind of person to use, which can be clearly seen from the amount of discussion and interaction data on the two topics.
Therefore, here I still hope that you will not rush to conclusions when looking at this kind of news on the Internet.
Finally, post an interesting comment, let's take a look at the #Headline Creation Challenge#
Source article - CCTV roll call: The latest report on the bullying incident of junior high school students in Nanning No. 3 Middle School! Netizens exposed the inside of the school
The person you may be discussing the same thing with is someone who doesn't even have the ability to read broken sentences.