In the recent popular variety show, there is a link that has sparked widespread discussion, that is, commenting on the performance. Among them, a music critic commented on the performances in the show, especially for the contestants Xiaolu and Zhou Baihao. These evaluations have aroused heated discussions and thoughts among the audience, is it to improve the quality of the program, or is it just to create topics and attract attention?
Xiaolu put all his enthusiasm and energy into the performance, but it was criticized by music critics and even called a "failed work". Such an evaluation not only made Xiaolu feel aggrieved, but also aroused the audience's doubts about the fairness of the evaluation.
However, there are also some who take a different view. They believe that as public figures, it is normal to accept evaluations, and that the opinions of music critics may motivate artists to grow and progress better. They advocate that artists should learn to accept criticism, learn from it, and constantly improve their performance.
In this case, we can't help but think about how to balance personal emotions with the objectivity of public evaluations? Perhaps, the program producers can be more careful in designing the review session to ensure that the evaluation is fair and objective, and at the same time provide opportunities for the contestants to grow and improve. After all, a fair evaluation environment is not only conducive to the improvement of the quality of the program, but also can bring a better viewing experience to the audience.