For Huawei's question M7, everyone knows that it is very high-tech, and it is also liked by countless people, but the recent incident about the M7 car accident has really dominated the headlines of various platforms
The wife of the man in the accident also spoke out many times, hoping for justice
But in the face of this incident, netizens also gave such a message, and it is not difficult to see that this responsibility does not belong to the car company, but more caused by their own driving
On this topic, netizens are also gossiping and expressing their opinions
But it is also necessary to understand the woman's mood and respect the woman's thoughts
The photo of the man in the car accident has also been exposed, and it can be seen that he is very young and handsome, and his son is also very cute, and he feels sorry for the loss of such a young life
Whether it is the responsibility of the car or the driver, we should all learn a lesson from this matter, and drive a car no matter how expensive it is, safety first, and pay attention to concentration
The woman also expressed her own thoughts, and she still hoped for justice, but in the event of an accident, many parts were damaged, and she may not be able to provide relevant data
What is clear now is that, according to the regulations, the rear-end collision is the responsibility of the rear
There is also the issue that the video posted by the driver was deleted, it cannot be ruled out that the question has done public relations treatment, or it does not meet the requirements of the platform, so it still needs to be based on the facts
In the picture, it can be seen that the woman's husband has been rescued, lying next to the green belt and incapacitated, and he is still very sad in the face of the scene as a relative
But according to the report of Caijing.com Technology, Huawei's statement is indeed a bit chilling, after all, when you buy a car, you buy it for the brand
As a consumer, do you need to know where every product in the car comes from? And one thing, is there a statement at the time of purchase?
Subsequently, Bosch also issued a statement, and it was not carried at all, so whose thing belonged to it? This act of shirking responsibility undoubtedly made the family very chilled
But in general, the question is a responsibility that cannot be shirked, if the question community feels that there is a problem with the system, then the matter of accountability is the matter of the question, not the family
The door can't be opened, it's a fact, no matter what, as a car company with a more reputation, Wenjie should make a reasonable explanation and corresponding compensation to the family
Let the matter settle down as soon as possible, save the image of the car company, and make optimization treatment in the future, this is what should be done, not kicking it over