Yesterday, a friend who was doing business in India posted a photo of a tall statue on his circle of friends, saying, "I am also one of ......the makers!"
After knowing the ins and outs, I suddenly wanted to write an article about it! At first, I thought it was Mahatma Gandhi, but after comparing it, I found that it was not! He said that it was built by the Indian government looking for their company, Jiangxi Tongqingjin Craft Company!
In the tide of globalization, the construction of national symbols is often full of complex backgrounds and meanings. The Statue of Unity in the Indian state of Gujarat is a thought-provoking example. This statue, which claims to be the tallest statue in the world, has not only caused widespread discussion in terms of technology, but also made waves in terms of manufacturing capabilities between countries.
The incident started when the Indian government spent Rs 3,400 crore to build a tall statue of unity. The project has attracted attention around the world and is highly anticipated for its design height and grandiose form. However, when the statue was finally presented to the world, it was ridiculed for the huge gaps that were exposed during its assembly. From a distance, the imprecise stitching makes the statue look like it's wearing a "plaid shirt," which not only has become a laughing stock on social media, but India has dumped the pot to make in China.
Some people say that this is a bit like going to the execution ground, and we have to respect every country, but this is really like being executed! Of course, just remove the shelves at the back!
It turned out that some of the components of the statue were made in China. Made in China has proven itself as a leader in the manufacturing industry over the past few decades, from high-quality industrial products to exquisite craftsmanship, China has carved out a niche in the global manufacturing industry. So, when these parts, labeled "Made in China", were shipped to India and assembled into this spectacular statue, there was naturally a higher expectation of the level of craftsmanship.
However, this does not mean that there is a problem with China's casting technology. Instead, the problem lies with the assembly and regulation on the Indian side. As some reviews have noted, Indian workers appear to be unskilled in handling delicate assembly work, resulting in splicing errors. This technical flaw has led to questions about why such a statue would cost so much money to build in a country with so many hungry people.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's tears of emotion at the ribbon-cutting ceremony in 2018 may be a direct reflection of this ambivalence. He is proud of India's vision for the future and what it has achieved so far, but at the same time he has to face criticism and ridicule at home and abroad for the project. The Statue of Unity has become a symbol of Modi's government, reflecting both its commitment to national unity and development, as well as the challenges in implementing large-scale projects.
Actually, I think it's due to the difference in color between the real person and the statue......
This case makes us think about what a country's self-presentation should be based on: its glorious history, its economic power, or its concern for the well-being of its people? True strength comes from people's happiness, social harmony and sustainable development strategies.
The story of the Statue of Unity reminds us that even the grandest buildings require solid foundations and meticulous work. Whether it's made in China or assembled in India, the real question is not about technology or craftsmanship, but about how we balance the pride of our country with the challenges of reality, and how we can pursue a huge symbolic project without losing sight of the basic needs of the people and the long-term development of the country. It's not realistic for everyone to be hungry and look at a tall statue every day......
#以书之名#