Loading...
Official "Li Moumou Declassified": The exposure of the nickname is not a violation of discipline and not a foul
In the examination room of Beijing Film Academy, an art candidate named Li Moumou immediately became a "star" on the popular list because he inadvertently revealed his name during the exam.
The person in charge of the examination institute said in an interview that after a detailed investigation of the incident, it was confirmed that although Li's behavior violated the examination discipline, it did not reach the level of cheating. In this era of information explosion, many netizens have launched heated discussions in the comment area, and some netizens ridiculed: "Li Moumou is so famous, his name is more famous than Nortel." Some are "distressed by Li Moumou for five seconds", thinking that such a mistake is too harsh for an art candidate.
Nortel's "unintentional insertion": violation of discipline does not affect the fairness of the results
Immediately afterwards, the person in charge of the examination institute also explained the specific situation. The investigation team not only carefully reviewed the video materials of the examination, but also carefully reviewed the examination rules of the school, and had a face-to-face conversation with the judges on the spot. This series of actions proves that there is no improper transfer of benefits between the school's examination staff and the outside training institutions.
This conclusion undoubtedly gives the public a clear signal that the Beijing Film Academy has strict regulations and measures to ensure the fairness and impartiality of the examination. Netizens also had mixed reactions to this, with some saying: "Nortel's investigation speed is faster than my hand speed in playing games." Some netizens joked: "From now on, you can say your name casually in the exam, and it is not cheating anyway." ”
The Battle of the "Exam Mecca": Nortel's Strict Law Enforcement
Loading...
In fact, in this incident, after discovering Li Moumou's disciplinary violations, the Beijing Film Academy did not take immediate measures, but allowed him to complete the exam. However, during the results review stage, the school canceled the test results according to the rules. To a certain extent, this practice reflects the school's respect for the examination rules and the protection of the rights and interests of candidates.
Although such a consequence is unfortunate for a certain person in Lee, it is necessary to maintain the fairness of the test. This also reminds all art candidates to a certain extent that the rules must be strictly followed during the examination process.
However, netizens' attitude towards this is obviously more lively, "Nortel's guard of the exam rules is stricter than my guarding of my door", and some netizens ridiculed, "Can Nortel apply for the 'Best Rule Enforcement Award' for this wave of operations?"
Nortel and the Examination Institute's "Joint Declaration": Fairness is the last word
As for the Beijing Education Examination Agency, they said that they will continue to strengthen supervision to ensure that every work of art examinations is open, fair and just. If any violations are found, they will be dealt with seriously in accordance with the relevant regulations to ensure that the interests of each candidate are not infringed.
This statement seems to give a guarantee of confidence to the majority of candidates and the public, and everyone is looking forward to the Beijing Film Academy to provide a more transparent and fair examination environment in the future. Young users on social media have a lot of discussions about this, some say, "It seems that the art exam is not only talented, but also human!" and some netizens joked, "It's like playing a game, the rules are the hidden final boss." ”
"Real Names" in the Examination Room: Technological Surveillance and the Battle of Human Nature
All in all, this incident of "examination discipline violation" about Li Moumou has aroused widespread attention and discussion in society. On the one hand, it is because the art examination itself has a high degree of attention, and on the other hand, because the strict implementation of the examination rules has caused people to think about the relationship between rules and fairness.
In this case, we see the rigor of technological surveillance and the strict enforcement of examination rules, and at the same time, we also see the society's concern for the delicate balance between the personal rights and interests of candidates and fairness and justice.
So, dear netizens, what do you think? How should such behavior be defined if you unintentionally reveal your name in the exam? Welcome to leave your opinion in the comment area.
Loading...