The past few years of the new crown epidemic have brought endless tribulations to human society. In this hard battle, vaccines are regarded as the "key" to restrain the epidemic and restore economic order. Chinese scientist Professor Yang Xiaoming's outstanding contributions to the development of the novel coronavirus disease vaccine have earned him the reputation of "the father of the new crown vaccine" and once became a scientific hero in the hearts of netizens.
Loading...
Official heavy confirmation news
Recently, it was reported that Professor Yang Xiaoming was investigated by relevant departments for illegal operations in the process of vaccine research and development. As soon as the news was exposed, it sparked heated discussions. After the news broke, netizens expressed disbelief. Soon after, the relevant departments issued an important notice on this matter, officially confirming the rumors that Professor Yang Xiaoming was suspected of violating the rules.
The notice pointed out that Professor Yang Xiaoming did not operate in accordance with the prescribed procedures during the clinical trial stage of the new coronavirus disease vaccine, and there was a major misconduct, which is currently under further investigation. As soon as this bombshell news came out, many people were in disbelief.
Many people have heated their rhetoric, questioning Yang Xiaoming's inappropriateness will bring hidden dangers to the development and use of vaccines, and also create unnecessary psychological burdens for the public. Affected by this news, people's trust in vaccines has also declined.
Netizens are fierce
After the news was broadcast, netizens' discussions about Yang Xiaoming also heated up. Some netizens said that this was expected by them, there were many details that seemed to be problematic, and some people said that they were extremely shocked and never thought that Yang Xiaoming would have an accident. There has been a lot of rhetoric, almost all of which is about concerns about the safety of vaccines.
In the face of such discussions, some medical experts have spoken to analyze the ins and outs of the incident and reassure the public. They pointed out that it was not advisable to draw hasty conclusions until the final findings of the investigation were made. In previous vaccine clinical trials, individual inappropriate handling had limited impact on overall safety, and the public should not be overly sensitive. Scientific researchers should uphold noble professional ethics and ensure the standardization and credibility of the experiment.
Some experts also called for transparency to be particularly important. Whatever the outcome, it needs to be fully explained to dispel public doubts. It is hoped that the relevant departments will strengthen the supervision of similar projects, put an end to possible drawbacks, and win greater trust from the public. Only by getting the message through well can we minimize public unease.
Lessons and lessons
This incident once again highlights the importance of the attitude of researchers. Any violation could undermine the co-operative COVID response. The relatively anonymous Internet also has a great impact on the dissemination of events and public opinion. How to regulate the network and avoid the use of communication manipulation will also become a detailed item for future thinking.
Relevant regulatory authorities also need to deeply reflect on whether there are loopholes in the regulatory process and continue to strengthen it. Researchers should uphold unquestionable ethical principles of research. The flow of information also needs to be fairer and more professional. It is equally important for the public to digest the news rationally, and only with the cooperation of all parties can similar incidents be well prevented and handled, and promote scientific research to move on the right track.