Kailu County showed the State Council documents, and the dust settled on the collection of fees
Recently, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, has aroused widespread attention from public opinion because of the incident of cadres blocking spring ploughing. With the release of the official notice, the seemingly simple issue of charging fees has gradually revealed the complex entanglement of interests behind it. This incident not only tested the wisdom of the local government, but also affected the nerves of the majority of netizens.
First, the charging turmoil started, and the supplementary contracting fee caused heated discussions
The incident originated from Kailu County's move to collect paid royalties for the use of newly added farmland. Originally, it was an attempt to make efficient use of land resources, but unexpectedly aroused strong opposition from some large households. They were unwilling to pay the supplementary contract fee, and even joined other villagers to obstruct the spring planting. For a time, the originally peaceful countryside was disturbed by this turmoil.
Second, the official report was timely, and the processing results were praised
Under the pressure of public opinion, Kailu County quickly set up an investigation team and announced the results. The dismissal of the cadres involved and the punishment of internal party warnings have demonstrated the importance and determination of the government to this matter. At the same time, the circular explained in detail the background and basis of the supplementary contracting fee, so that the public has a clearer understanding of this.
Third, the State Council's document has established the Haishen needle, and the charging behavior is reasonable and well-founded
However, the turmoil did not subside. Some netizens questioned the legality of the charging behavior. Kailu County took action again and directly moved out of the State Council policy document. This document clearly supports Inner Mongolia to carry out the pilot work of efficient use of new cultivated land, and provides a strong policy basis for the charging behavior of Kailu County. At the same time, Kailu County also explained in detail the classification and disposal of fees, as well as the publicity procedures before charging, showing the standardization and transparency of its work.
Fourth, the villagers' contract was exposed, and the change in the nature of the land led to speculation
With the in-depth investigation of the incident, the villagers' contracting contracts were also exposed. The contract clearly states that the contracted land will be used for the construction of dairy farms, but today the land is used for farming. This change has sparked speculation about the changing nature of the land. There is a view that villagers should bear the corresponding costs for changing the use of land without authorization. The additional contracting fee charged by Kailu County is a correction to this behavior.
Fifth, behind the heated discussions among netizens, entanglements of interests surfaced
This incident sparked widespread heated discussions among netizens. Some netizens believe that five yuan per mu to contract more than 5,000 acres of land, such a price is obviously much lower than the market price. These villagers are extraordinary, and most likely have special backgrounds. Their actions may be inextricably linked to certain interest groups. The charging behavior of Kailu County may be a positive response to these entanglements of interests.
Sixth, the arrogant attitude of village and town cadres has aroused public dissatisfaction
Although Kailu County has sufficient grounds and reasons for charging fees, the attitude of village and town cadres in handling the matter has aroused public dissatisfaction. In the video, they have an arrogant attitude and rude language, and there is a fierce conflict with the masses. This simple and crude way of working not only fails to solve the problem, but aggravates the intensification of the conflict.
7. The incident continues to ferment, and legal means have become a solution
At present, this incident is still fermenting. Kailu County has restored the normal order of spring ploughing, but the problems involved still need to be resolved through legal means. This also reminds us that when dealing with similar issues, we should pay more attention to laws and regulations, fairness and fairness, and avoid simple and crude working methods.
epilogue
Although this Kailu County fee turmoil seems simple, it actually hides complex interests and social problems behind it. It tests the wisdom of the government and the justice and fairness of society. We hope that this issue can be properly resolved through legal means and inject new vitality into the harmony and stability of the countryside. At the same time, we also hope that governments at all levels can draw lessons from this, pay more attention to administering according to law, serve the masses, and contribute to building a better society.