"Whether I want to pay it or not, this is a question worth pondering. "When the 6,000 acres of collective pasture in Shuangsheng Village, Kailu County, was changed to corn land by the contractor, in the face of the town and village cadres who came to "urge the fee", I Zhang Mouzhu couldn't help but think like this in my heart. The fierce controversy caused by this "cadres blocking farming" seems to have simplified everything into a confrontation of "whether to hand over or not to pay".
But when you think about it in the position of the person concerned, many complex emotions and considerations will really be exposed. Of course, I understand the feelings of the village collective and the villagers. What will they think about the fact that they have been living on this pasture for many years, and suddenly we have changed it to other uses and lost their original source of livelihood?
If we think differently, we should distribute and use this land more fairly and reasonably, instead of unilaterally deciding to grow corn for profit. At the same time, I also understand the reason why the government wants us to pay back the user fee. After a change of land use, it is true that the relevant fees should be repaid for legalization.
But there seems to be something wrong with what they have done, otherwise why would we have refused to pay the fee and triggered this confrontation? Under all kinds of complicated emotions, what should I do? Frankly speaking, if I really want to immediately come up with a usage fee of 200 yuan per mu, I will still be unwilling in my heart. But after much thought, I decided to take the initiative to cooperate and actively pay the usage fee.
The intention of doing this is not to bow to the town and village cadres, nor is it simply to resolve contradictions. Instead, from the perspective of the Shuangsheng Village collective and the villagers, make a responsible decision. Let's not say that it is illegal for us to change the use of land, but at least we should seek the opinions of the village collectives and villagers. They have autonomy over the land, and we can't dispose of it on our own.
Now that the matter has come to this, taking the initiative to pay back the royalties can be regarded as compensation for their rights. The conversion of this land into a cornfield has really increased our income. But this is also due to the use of public resources such as groundwater resources. Payment of user fees can compensate for the consumption of public resources.
Other villagers in Shuangsheng Village also paid royalties when they changed land use, and it seems that we do not pay special treatment. In order to resolve disputes and treat everyone equally, we should also take the initiative to cooperate with the policy. Of course, relying only on one party's initiative to compromise will not solve the problem fundamentally. The standard and purpose of the fee should be made public, and if there is any inappropriateness in the collection process, it is also necessary to reflect on and improve.
After that, we still need to negotiate with the village collectives to determine how to use the land more fairly and reasonably. But the most urgent thing at the moment is to ease the antagonism between the two sides as soon as possible. I believe that taking the initiative to pay is a good start. It sends a signal that we are not completely disregarding the collective good, and that we are willing to actively repair relationships and rebuild mutual trust.
To those who insist that we should no longer pay, I understand your thoughts and thank you for your concern for our rights. However, I believe that instead of dwelling on what we don't want to do, we should take positive actions and reap the benefits of harmonious development in the future through tolerance and understanding. This turmoil of "cadres blocking farming" is a painful learning experience for all parties involved.
But after each ordeal, as long as we can give in to each other and reflect together, we will surely be able to open up a new path of hope. I believe that through the efforts of all parties, we will be able to turn hostility into friendship and re-establish a harmonious and mutually supportive inter-village relationship. If I were a party to this incident, I would choose to pay the royalties.
Not only for self-preservation, but also for the hope of resolving the current impasse and opening up a win-win situation for all parties. I will actively communicate with the village collectives and villagers to understand their demands, express my apologies, and strive for their understanding. I will actively cooperate with the implementation of the policy with the town and village cadres, but I will also reflect the inappropriateness in their work and urge them to improve their working methods.
I hope that all parties involved will put aside their prejudices and not be blindly swayed by opposing emotions, but put themselves in the other person's shoes. As long as we understand and support each other and work together, we will be able to resolve this turmoil and rebuild harmonious and beautiful inter-village relations.
Warm reminder, this article is the first work of the original headlines, it is forbidden to carry it to other platforms within 72 hours, and the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding