Since the start of the Russian-Ukrainian war, drones have become a prominent science, but if you don't know about drones, then basically the threshold of modern warfare cannot be touched. Many battlefield footage shows that now whether you are in a pit or a house, FPV can chase you and fight, and larger drones will fight around you, and they will not be able to run at all. And with the application of UAVs, various anti-UAV methods are also varied, what tank awnings, electronic monsters, chain bombs wound propellers (see picture) are countless. So as a drone industry powerhouse, how is our anti-drone, this time let the West see how our PLA is anti-drone.
According to the CCTV military report, we are extensively carrying out training in new tactics, new forces and new technologies, one of which is very important is anti-UAV, which is also part of the "new three strikes and three defenses". The report screen shows that a team is training anti-drone technology, which mentions that after a single soldier encounters a drone, what methods are used to ensure safety, it can be said that there are really many methods.
The first is the anti-drone electronic jamming gun, this time it is a new domestic anti-drone weapon, compared with the airport security guard, it can be seen that the difference is obvious, this appearance is very sci-fi. This new jamming gun is a long strip as a whole, and the trigger is gone when one is lifted, and simplicity and practicality are also the basic requirements of a weapon. For jamming guns, there are only 2 key points, jamming power and scrambling frequency range, the former determines the attack range, and if you can interfere with the opponent earlier, you have a greater chance of survival. The latter determines the jamming success rate and directly determines the outcome of the anti-drone. In the case of DJI drones, the civilian version has more than 140 frequency hopping points, which has good anti-jamming capabilities.
I believe that this new domestic weapon should take these issues into account. At present, this weapon should be decentralized to the squad and become a basic anti-drone weapon. Let's think about it, as long as the Russian army can match 1-2 of these weapons in a squad, it will not be stared at by drones.
There is no way, the strength is not strong, there is only to pay the price, we have not eaten this loss before, and backwardness will be beaten, Da Mao's current experience is our past, in any era and any country is the eternal truth. It is estimated that if Da Mao sees this electronic jamming gun, he just wants to ask, Lao Tie, is there a civilian version of the same model?
Another individual anti-drone weapon is the trawl launcher, which shows a single soldier crawling in the picture, holding a cylinder that is a launcher, and a trawl is hidden inside, which can capture the shuttle before it hits, reducing the damage caused. The benefit of this equipment is that everyone can carry it with them, and it may be possible to reload and use it reloading. Compared with the electronic jamming gun, which takes up a lot of space to carry, it is more convenient and more suitable for individual use.
These are all at the equipment level, and at the tactical action level, anti-drones are also popular, including preparing to roll, dodge, if you use cover, you can only say that it is very detailed, definitely not the kind of shouting, it is really practicing, after all, the situation of the Russian-Ukrainian war is bloody. And now the training syllabus has added anti-drone attack, subject setting: using suicide drones and bomb throwers to simulate the battlefield environment, and exercise the fighters' ability to counter and strike UAVs. What does this mean, add to the outline, that is the item to be assessed, and every individual soldier will have the basic ability to counter drones in the future.
It is not an exaggeration to say that the whole army has practiced anti-UAVs, setting off a small upsurge in training anti-UAV skills and tactics, after all, it usually sweats more, summarizes more, and can only shed less blood when it really fights. You must know that now any civilian military in Myanmar can pull out a professional drone team, even if it is not a high-intensity battlefield like Russia and Ukraine, in the middle of medium and low intensity, anti-anti-drone is also a basic ability. At present, the trend of our anti-drone is to equip as much as possible with a team and a simple means for each person, not only to systematically counter the drone, but also to reduce the damage of each individual soldier.
After all, a war in Iraq and a war between Russia and Ukraine are all historical opportunities for us, and at the critical stage of the development and transformation of weapons and equipment, we can stay out of the matter, pay attention with the most sober eyes, and find the latest direction for the development of our military equipment in a timely manner, which is somewhat lucky. And the more prepared you are, the better you can perform when it matters most.
Generally speaking, whether it is Russia and Ukraine, or Myanmar, most of their drones are equivalent to the domestic civilian level, let's sow a seed, a forestry survey level of drones, on their side is a high-end weapon. But even so, we do not slack off on the research and training of anti-UAVs, strategically defying, tactically attaching importance to the enemy, and never underestimating the enemy, just by virtue of this, victory will definitely belong to us.
Thanks for the appreciation