Who owns the right to use and control the lower berth of the hard sleeper train? This is a question that people have encountered many times during long-distance travel and have never seriously thought about it, let alone treated it "more seriously." People, including the author himself, have never been refused to sit in the lower berth to rest, and there has never been a refusal to sit on the lower berth I bought to rest in the upper and middle berths. And every time I eat, I take the initiative to persuade them to eat at the small table in the lower bunk. Meeting is fate, and getting along in harmony during travel is "happiness" - this is the consensus of every passenger, and it is also the public order and good customs on the train.
Now this "public order and good customs" has been "challenged"! First of all, the official website of the railway 12306 has spoken, the buyer of the lower berth has the right to control and use the lower berth, and the central media supports the view of the official website of the railway that "whoever buys the ticket should be in charge", reminding the lower berth to also convey goodwill and friendship. Some people summarize the attitude of the official website of the railway and the central media as "it is a love to let the upper and middle bunks sit and rest, and it is their duty not to let them"! That is to say, it is reasonable and legal for the lower bunks not to let the upper and middle bunks sit and rest, and it is good to be kind and happy to allow the upper and middle bunks to be a good person.
Is that really the case? No!
According to the comments of netizens "Let's Have a Cup of Coffee on a Sunny Day After the Rain", it is recorded in the literature that when the sleeper designer designed the space, he took into account that the aisle chairs were not enough to sit, and compressed the space of the upper and middle bunks to the lower bunks, so that everyone could sit and rest. To put it bluntly, the default lower bunk has a public role.
I believe what this netizen said is true!
The starting point and ultimate goal of the work of our party and government is to serve the people and the overwhelming majority of the people. The train is a means of public transportation, and the design of its internal facilities must be considered by the majority of people, and both "public" and "communal" represent the vast majority.
For many years, why has there been no or very rare dispute between the upper and middle berths and the lower berths over the "right to rest"? That is, both the passengers, the conductor, and the conductor agree with the "public" role of the lower berth. Existence justifies it. What is reasonable for a long time is good customs, and abiding by good customs has become public order!
Of course, playing the public role of the lower bunk is in no way a denial of the right to use the "lower bunk". It's just a matter of finding a balance between the two. That is, the upper and middle bunks are not allowed to be in the lower bunk during sleeping time, and when eating, 3 people rotate 2 tables (including those in the aisle), and when sitting and resting, the people who sit and rest in the lower bunk are on the side of the aisle.
- These should be clearly "regulated"!
In addition, the lower berths should be sold 5 hours before the drive, regardless of age, and the rest of the time should meet the needs of seniors over 60 years old. The elderly not only consciously identify with public order and good customs, but also adapt and integrate.
。 The train carriage is a "small society", and as long as everyone gives a little love, the "small society" is the world of love.