Ji Yunhao, an "arrogant and domineering" township cadre, was disciplined and dismissed from his post at the same time, along with two other village cadres.
I have read the relevant circulars, and the reason for dealing with them is that the work attitude is simple and rude, and there is a lack of warmth for the masses.
At the same time, the land involved will continue to be cultivated, and other issues related to law and illegality, and whether there is a fee or not, may be resolved by judicial means.
For the above practices, I generally understand and recognize, especially for the punishment of Ji Yunhao and the three of them, I think there is nothing wrong with it.
Let's talk about my personal understanding of whether this land should be charged. My personal view is that there should be no charge and the contractor should not be allowed to continue farming, but that the land or farmland should be bulldozed and the grassland restored. In this matter, we can simply call returning farmland to grassland.
In the past two days, the relevant departments have made public the contract for this grassland, and it can be seen that when this grassland was contracted 20 years ago, it was used for pasture. At that time, there were only more than 100 acres of cultivated land, and now most of the more than 5,000 acres of grassland have been turned into cultivated land.
And this, without a doubt, is a violation of the original contract. From this point of view, restitution is fully justified.
Of course, I personally feel that this is not the point, the point is that the grassland really should not be converted to arable land. Just now I saw a netizen discuss the local precipitation, he said it professionally, and the summary is that the local precipitation is really small, less than Beijing.
After the grassland is converted to arable land, natural precipitation cannot support the growth of crops. The cultivation of more than 5,000 acres of land will inevitably draw a large amount of groundwater, which will cause secondary damage to the ecology.
We can imagine that if these more than 5,000 acres of land continue to be cultivated, will it become desertified and Gobi in a few years? In particular, there are still 10 years left in the contract, so what will it look like after 10 years?
To sum up, I believe that this piece of land is not a question of whether or not to charge and how much to charge, but that it should not be converted into arable land at all. Therefore, I personally think that there are three things that should be done now:
First, in the past 20 years, if a contractor has changed the use of land and at the same time subcontracted to another party, is this considered a violation of the law or a crime?
Second, in the process, did the local authorities discover the existence of such facts? If they say that they did not discover it, or if they did not stop it in time, I personally believe that this is a dereliction of duty, and the relevant leaders should also be held responsible.
Third, the land should not be allowed to continue cultivation at all, but should be bulldozed to restore the grasslands.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss.