laitimes

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

author:Hi Koko

There is an old Chinese saying that "food and color are sexual", and the ancestors were so open-minded, and young people who have accepted new ideas and new cultures will not talk about "sex" as they did decades ago.

However, there is one thing that must be clarified, facing up to physiological needs, should not be linked to "obscenity and pornography", some people are indeed a little too free.

With the continuous popularity of mobile terminals and social networks, some people have begun to find excitement on the Internet, messy dating information, grandiose "fill-in-the-blank questions", and many places will be filled with some tacit code words.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

With the joint efforts of China's Internet police and social platforms, the pornography industry has been legally involved in some countries, but it is a real violation in the mainland, and with the joint efforts of China's Internet police and social platforms, it has been necessary to carry out an average of several rounds of Internet clean-up operations every year in recent years, and give netizens a clean Internet.

However, have you ever considered a question, the net cleaning action is there every year, why is it still repeatedly banned?

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

The chain of interests behind the site

When the rate of profit reaches 50 percent, capital is willing to take risks for its sake, when the rate of profit reaches 100 percent, they feel that the law of the world is nothing more than that, and when the rate of profit reaches 300 percent, they can commit any crime.

Mr. Marx is somewhat conservative, and the industry, which has the Internet as a medium, can be regarded as a huge profit.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

Let's take the most well-known site P station as an example, if you don't look at the content of the website, just look at the parameters and data, P station is definitely an Internet miracle, with more than 50 million registered users in 19 days, and this is just registered users, this site allows anonymous tourists to exist.

Traffic is about equal to money,This argument is perfectly reflected in the P station,It's hard to imagine that an 80% of the website is free resources,The annual profit can reach billions of dollars,This doesn't include the dividends that part of the "film and television team" has to go and the actors' "salary",How do they make money?Can paid members afford to support so many people?

Of course not, the huge number of views can make advertising revenue rise.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

What's more, when the pornography industry forms a system, it will join many gray industries to form a distorted and tight chain of interests, with messy dating apps, colorful gambling information, and even harmful telecom fraud......

In the face of the huge disparity in the return on investment ratio, some people can never go back once they step into this deep pit.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

Why can't pornographic websites be closed?

Faced with the mountains of gold and silver in front of them, the organizers of pornographic websites decided to take a risk, and the first hurdle in front of them was the "heaven and earth net" laid by the Chinese Internet police.

365 days a 24 hours a year big data screening, every year to focus on rectifying several rounds of "clean network action", how do these criminals survive in round after round of encirclement and suppression?

Their tricks are actually quite simple and crude, playing crowd tactics and cunning rabbit holes, these not very clean websites generally do not have only one domain name, even if the developers are lazy to change once a week, some of them are eager to change several domain names in a day.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

They won't cover up more on the domain name, anyway, one is blocked, and the other is often chased by the Internet police along the network cable, and the content and customers have been migrated to the new domain name.

Check the IP! Catch the source! A set of things in the TV series, how come they don't care in real life?

It's not that the Internet police in real life are not powerful enough, but the criminals in the TV series seem to have serious problems in their heads.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

The villain in the film and television drama stays in China to open a website, and even the IP uses a domestic domain name, and he has become a sieve, and it will take several episodes for the Internet police to catch up, if this is placed in real life, this kind of person will definitely not survive the first episode.

In reality, criminals are all playing "matryoshka dolls", and they may be hiding in the corners of a small Southeast Asian country, and the domain name is first set with the IP of an unknown island country, and then they all travel around the continents and oceans, and finally buy 180 proxies from China.

The algorithm is very old, and the program is definitely not smart, but it is really difficult to peel off their skin layer by layer, and even if you take it off for cross-border law enforcement, there will always be someone who will fight with you.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

But then again, whether it is a nesting doll tactic or a crowd tactic, there must always be programmers to provide technical support, overseas bosses are not so easy to catch, other people who work for obscene pornographic websites, are they also overseas?

Perhaps the real industry system is even more disgusting than we imagined.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

Who is aiding the abuse?

Strange to say, it seems that every Internet user has been exposed to these intricate websites.

You may not have clicked in, but you must have been spicy by those highly saturated "psoriasis ads", which may be in the advertising pop-up window of a novel website, or in the advertising area of a resource station.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

I don't know if you realize it, sites never seem to be a single gray area. In that area, you can see the mess of dating apps, and you can also see "sexy dealers, online dealing".

In a sense, these layered domain names have become the "red light district" of the Internet.

We often say that pornographic information will have an adverse effect on teenagers, but now these pornographic websites seem to be poisonous not only people's three views, it really reaches into everyone's pockets.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

In the movie "All or Nothing", the leader of the scam syndicate once had the idea of inserting the link into the subtitle group's resources, and in the pornographic website, they don't need to wear the skin of sponsorship at all, because it is likely that the website itself is also their income.

Once the website audience is alerted to the messy advertising content, it is likely to fall into the "candy scam" under the steps of the lawbreakers, and everyone who has been deceived firmly believes that they will not be deceived, and only when they really see the "coffin" will they regret it.

This actually explains who exactly is maintaining these pornographic sites?

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

Wire fraud websites need technical team staff, only need to give them a little "small profit", in the face of the threat of sticks, they don't care about giving themselves "overtime" at all.

Not only technicians, but also those young and beautiful girls may also be "fools" who have been deceived by high-salary traps.

This group of people has no way to retreat from the moment they leave the country, and the masterminds behind the scenes will never allow this group of "insiders" to leave, even if they are really lucky enough to escape from the park, there is a high probability that they will just jump from one fire pit to another.

Why doesn't the state completely eliminate it, because technology is not good or driven by profits?

Perhaps pornography sites take advantage of human nature, and their profit margins are determined by the audience, in other words, only the continuous passage of viewers will make the unscrupulous people lose interest in this gray industry.

For ordinary people, those foreign elements are beyond our reach, but everyone can at least manage themselves.

#头条创作挑战赛#

Read on