Copywriting丨Entertainment No. 8 Weekly Diary
Editor丨Entertainment No. 8 Weekly Diary
If you think it's good, just click "Follow".
The Group of Seven (G7) countries and NATO have expressed concern about Russian cooperation, while US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's trip to the Middle East has attracted widespread attention.
What is the purpose of US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's trip to the Middle East?
His visits spanned the Middle East and were aimed at deepening U.S. influence in the region and discussing a range of key issues.
Blinken's main goals include maintaining regional stability, promoting the Middle East peace process, and strengthening containment of Iran.
As a result, the actions of the United States against Russian cooperation have also attracted widespread attention.
The United States announced its intention to sanction the National Bank of Russia, a move seen as an important step in putting pressure on Russia.
The US side's arguments and accusations against Russia's cooperation have also become more and more acute, showing its strong dissatisfaction with Russia in international affairs.
The West's attitude towards Russian cooperation is also changing.
The G7 members joined forces to express their concerns about Russia's cooperation, emphasizing the threat posed to Russia and the demands on Russia.
This move shows the unity and firm position of Western countries on the Russian issue.
Russia's response and actions to this are not weak.
The Russian side firmly stated that it will continue to cooperate without external interference.
Russia's announcement of the progress of de-dollarization of Russian trade shows its determination and strength in responding to US sanctions.
There are a number of reasons behind the fact that countries in the Middle East are not interested in the actions proposed by the United States.
The United States' biased stance in favor of Israel has aroused dissatisfaction and concern among countries in the Middle East.
Regional countries have a clearer understanding of U.S. unreliability and are reluctant to rely too heavily on U.S. role in regional affairs.
The reluctance of Arab countries to confront the Houthis in Yemen has also influenced their attitude towards US action.
In the current international political arena, various forces are intertwined and present a complex situation.
U.S. diplomatic moves in the Middle East and cooperative actions with Russia, as well as changes in Western attitudes toward Russia, will have a significant impact on the global political landscape.
How to deal with this change has become an urgent issue for policymakers in various countries to seriously consider and solve.
In the recent Middle East turmoil, the actions of the United States have attracted much attention.
What it is doing in the region has not met the expected goals.
There are many reasons for this situation, one of which is the bias of the United States on regional affairs.
Some of the actions of the United States in the Middle East in the past have been seen as favoritism in favor of the interests of certain countries, which has led to the perception of unreliability by some regional countries.
This perception affects the level of trust these countries have in the actions led by the United States, limiting American influence in the region.
The reluctance of Arab countries to confront the Houthis in Yemen is also an important factor in the current situation.
To address this complexity, policymakers need to take a number of steps.
The United States needs to be more cautious in formulating its Middle East policy and avoid excessive interference in regional affairs, so as not to arouse the resentment of regional countries.
The United States should take a more impartial and neutral stance and not take sides with specific countries or forces, so as to rebuild the trust of regional countries.
The United States should work more closely with countries in the region to jointly address regional challenges and enhance regional security and stability.
It also requires the active participation of Russia and other major powers to jointly safeguard peace and development in the Middle East.
The international community should be more flexible about the reluctance of Arab countries to confront Yemen's Houthi rebels.
The sovereignty and security interests of each country should be respected, and solutions should be sought through dialogue and consultation to minimize the impact of conflicts and instability on the region.
During Blinken's trip to the Middle East, he achieved some noteworthy results.
Israel's agreement to send a United Nations assessment team to northern Gaza is expected to bring some relief to the situation in Gaza.
The Palestinian National Authority's commitment to reform has opened up new possibilities for the future political development of Palestine.
The UN Security Council adopted a resolution condemning the Houthis in Yemen, which shows the concern and attitude of the international community towards the situation in Yemen.
Although these achievements have certain positive significance, they have not completely solved many problems in the Middle East.
On the other hand, US sanctions and provocations have not affected Russia's relations with the region.
On the contrary, the trend of cooperation between Russia and the Middle East is gradually strengthening, which poses a certain challenge to the United States.
This suggests that the United States' ability to influence and control in the region is gradually waning, and that other countries, such as Russia, are filling this gap.
U.S. efforts to lobby many countries to combat the Houthis have failed.
The dispute between Turkey and Greece has seriously affected Turkey's attitude, making it difficult for it to actively participate in regional affairs.
Embroiled in intra-regional disputes, Turkey finds itself in a difficult situation, both internally and externally, to effectively perform its role as an intermediary, let alone actively participate in the fight against the Houthis.
The rejection of the Arab States to a military solution to the Red Sea crisis is also a major obstacle.
While the Houthi activities in the Red Sea region pose a serious threat to the stability of the region, Arab countries prefer to resolve the issue diplomatically rather than take military action.
They are deeply concerned about the regional instability and humanitarian catastrophe that military intervention could trigger, so they have not responded positively to the US lobby.
Israel's military pressure and external threats have made other countries reluctant to join, making the U.S. lobbying program unsuccessful.
Israel has taken a tough military stance in response to the imminent threat from the Houthis, and has warned and restricted the participation of other countries.
This has put pressure on other countries to join the U.S. because they don't want to come into conflict with Israel or be drawn into a confrontation between Israel and the Houthis.
The U.S. move in the Middle East has fallen short of expectations because of its bias in favor of Israel, regional perceptions of its unreliability, and Arab reluctance to confront Yemen's Houthi rebels.
This experience has shown us the complex situation in the Middle East and the game between the forces of various parties, and also reminds us of the need for more careful and thoughtful consideration in dealing with Middle East affairs in the future.
Only by coordinating the interests of all parties and seeking consensus can we effectively resolve the problems in the Middle East and achieve long-term stability and peace.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, delete or change it immediately after contacting.