#头条创作挑战赛#
On April 24, Inner Mongolia again reported the incident of "paying money for farming"! Unexpectedly, this time there was a reversal, and it turned out to be the contractor Zhang's breach of contract first??!
Even Zhang's unauthorized reclamation of grasslands, changing land use, and destroying the ecological environment are interpreted by relevant lawyers as suspected illegal and criminal acts, and may face fines and sentences!?
Look at the picture and the truth, some of them are similar to him and have not only been sentenced, but also fined!!
Now netizens are really stunned!!
Source: @Dongsheng release
Source: @Dongsheng release
Event recap
Zhang paid 30 years of wasteland contract fees, from 1994 to 2034, it has not yet expired, but I didn't expect that when Gu Yu was farming, he was frantically blocked by the village committee!!
Zhang contracted about 5,600 acres of wasteland, and the village committee asked for a "contracting fee" of 200 yuan per mu, with a total price of more than 1 million yuan to no avail, and the contradiction between the two sides escalated!
"If I am asked to collect money from above, I will collect money" "What can I do when 110 comes"? Look at these classic lines, they actually flowed out of the mouth of the village party secretary, and the incident quickly rushed to the hot search for a while!!
The picture comes from the Internet
The secretary of the town party committee also bluntly said: I don't understand the law! Questioning the contractors for looting collective land and threatening that the contractors do not pay the "supplementary contract fee," they have the right to forcibly seize them, and even call the police to arrest them!
It made the comment area even more fried!
The picture comes from the Internet
Netizens have turned on the crusade mode and expressed their different thoughts on the incident:
Netizen A: Obviously, the common people have paid the contract fee for 30 years, but during the contract period, the village cadres and town cadres are asked to pay the "contract fee"?
Screenshot of netizen comments
Netizen B: As the secretary of the party committee, he even threatened, don't look for me if I don't know the law!
Even if the contractor really violates the law, he should go through the route of litigation, and there will be legal sanctions, and you should not enforce it!
Screenshot of netizen comments
Netizen C: Wasteland is uncultivated, and thousands of people fight for it! 20 years ago, wasteland was cheap, but now it is fertile land, so the contract fee will be added?
It's like I rent your rough house cheaply, and after I post a lot of money for fine decoration, you actually charge me extra rent according to fine decoration, which is too unreasonable!
Screenshot of netizen comments
Netizen D: Big things can't stop farming!!Who can afford to delay food?!Can't farm while investigating?
What is the legal basis for the supplementary contract fee of 200 yuan? I am here to collect money, I don't understand the law, so I want the peasants to pay the contract fee again, and it is really difficult to convince the public!!
Screenshot of netizen comments
God reversed
The follow-up situation is that the Kailu County Government attaches great importance to this and actively investigates and reports the situation.
Unexpectedly, sharp-eyed netizens here found that the 5,600 acres of barren grassland contracted by Zhang 30 years ago were contracted for 4 yuan per mu per year, and after 20 years of care, they were subleased to others at a price of 700 yuan per mu per year!!
And it is the price difference of 500 yuan per mu, combined with the number of thousands of mu, that makes thousands of netizens angry!
Information source, Jiupai News
Source: Jiupai News
Some people say that 5600×700 = 3,920,000 yuan, which is 3.92 million yuan a year! 4 yuan of land you rent, 700 yuan away to sublease others, 700÷4 = 175 times the profit! 700-200, you still fall 500 per mu!!
You handed over 200 yuan, what's wrong?
Screenshot of netizen comments
Some people say, "If you only count the other party's income, how can you not count the other party's contributions?" For 20 years, filling in the land to buy cow dung, water and electricity, labor, and water conservancy, which item is not the cost? Listen to what the contractor said, over the years, nearly 10,000 yuan per mu has been invested!
At the beginning, no one rented 4 yuan per mu from the locals, so you can see how poor the quality of the land is! Otherwise, it would be the turn of the outsiders? Now that the land has been raised, the extra charges are really reasonable!??
Screenshot of netizen comments
Some people say, "You don't understand this!" Contractually speaking, the contractor has breached the contract, and the village committee has the right to take it back! Cultivating grassland into cultivated land without permission is suspected of violating the law! Look at some examples in some places!
On the premise of violating the law, you still let the cost be calculated!? Just like if you build a house in a place that violates the law, and the house is demolished for you, then you can only bear your own profits and losses!!
Source: Dongsheng release
Source: Dongsheng release
For this new round of reversal, netizens have launched fierce debates.
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
Screenshot of netizen comments
epilogue
5,600 mu of contracted land, with a term of 30 years! There are still 10 years to go, and now they are coming to add "supplementary contract fees"? The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable! There are too many legal details that are disputed about right and wrong, and it is really difficult to distinguish right from wrong in one sentence or two!!
According to the feedback of Jiupai News, after coordination and resolution, the relevant personnel have agreed to use litigation to claim their rights and interests, resolve conflicts, and protect their own interests.
Let's look forward to the follow-up official report, and hope that both the land contractor and the contracted party will have a relatively satisfactory result.
What do you think about this? Which point of view do you support in the article? Welcome to discuss and leave a message [cover your face]!
Source: Jiupai News