laitimes

What would have happened if Canada had insisted on not letting people go in the Meng Wanzhou incident?

author:沐姐

There is no such thing as a insistence in Canada that will not let people go. Because Canadians want to release people more than you do.

The script was originally conceived as in the Alstom case.

First of all, let me give you a popular science, the pride of France, Alstom, the United States' red eyes and hatred towards him at that time were similar to those towards Huawei now.

Then, like the detention of Meng Wanzhou, when Alstom's executive Pieruzzi was in transit in the United States, he directly took him down, on the grounds that he had bribed a power project in Indonesia, and he was not as hard as Meng Wanzhou, and quickly pleaded guilty.

Since you pleaded guilty, the company was suspected of paying bribes to get projects abroad, and then the US Department of Justice issued a huge fine to Alstom.

1. If Canada insists on not letting people go, it will lead to the deterioration of China-Canada relations and further affect the economic and trade exchanges between the two countries.

2. As a country governed by the rule of law, Canada must comply with legal process and has a duty to hand over suspects to justice if the evidence is substantiated.

3. If Canada succumbs to external pressures, it will damage its international image and the principles of the rule of law, and reduce its credibility in the international community.

4. In the international political arena, Canada needs to weigh the pros and cons and consider not only China-Canada relations, but also relations with other countries.

5. The Meng Wanzhou incident could be a turning point in the development of China-Canada relations, and the two governments need to work together to find a solution.

6. The Government of Canada shall maintain an independent foreign policy, free from interference by other countries, and safeguard its national interests.

What would have happened if Canada had insisted on not letting people go in the Meng Wanzhou incident?

7. The Meng Wanzhou affair may also raise global attention to the risks faced by executives of multinational corporations in international affairs.

8. With the integration of the global economy, multinational companies should comply with international laws and regulations to avoid unnecessary disputes.

9. If Canada insists on not letting it go, it may hinder Huawei's business in Canada and affect its competitiveness in the international market.

10. The Government of Canada needs to find a balance between upholding the rule of law and safeguarding the national interest to ensure that the case is dealt with fairly and equitably.

11. The Meng Wanzhou incident may also be a turning point in the Chinese people's perception of Canada, affecting the friendly exchanges between the two peoples.

12. In dealing with such sensitive matters, the Government of Canada should take public opinion into account and avoid domestic controversy.

13. If Canada insists on not releasing the detainees, it may lead to China imposing sanctions on Canada, which will further affect the relationship between the two countries.

14. In the international political game, Canada needs to be cautious so as not to fall prey to great-power disputes.

15. The Meng Wanzhou case could also serve as an important reference for other countries when dealing with similar issues.

16. In the context of globalization, multinational enterprises should strengthen compliance management and guard against legal risks.

17. If Canada insists on not releasing the people, it may trigger a boycott of Canadian products by the Chinese people and affect the economic and trade exchanges between the two countries.

18. The Government of Canada needs to respect the rule of law and international order while safeguarding the national interest.

What would have happened if Canada had insisted on not letting people go in the Meng Wanzhou incident?

19. The Meng Wanzhou incident could also serve as an opportunity for judicial cooperation between China and Canada to jointly combat transnational crime.

20. In dealing with such incidents, the Government of Canada should be transparent and explain its decision-making process to the public.

21. If Canada insists on not letting people go, it may lead to China taking countermeasures in the international arena and affecting the global political landscape.

22. The Government of Canada needs to play an active role in international politics to maintain international order and stability.

23. The Meng Wanzhou case may also serve as an important reference for other countries when dealing with similar issues.

24. In the context of globalization, multinational enterprises should strengthen compliance management and guard against legal risks.

25. If Canada insists on not releasing the people, it may trigger a boycott of Canadian products by the Chinese people and affect the economic and trade exchanges between the two countries.

26. The Government of Canada needs to respect the rule of law and the international order while safeguarding the national interest.

27. The Meng Wanzhou incident may also serve as an opportunity for China and Canada to jointly combat transnational crime in the area of judicial cooperation.

28. In dealing with such incidents, the Government of Canada should be transparent and explain its decision-making process to the public.

29. If Canada insists on not letting people go, it may lead to China's countermeasures in the international arena and affect the global political landscape.

30. The Government of Canada needs to play an active role in international politics to maintain international order and stability.

31. The Meng Wanzhou case may also serve as an important reference for other countries in dealing with similar issues.

What would have happened if Canada had insisted on not letting people go in the Meng Wanzhou incident?

32. In the context of globalization, multinational enterprises should strengthen compliance management and guard against legal risks.

33. If Canada insists on not letting people go, it may trigger a boycott of Canadian products by the Chinese people and affect economic and trade exchanges between the two countries.

34. The Government of Canada needs to respect the rule of law and the international order while safeguarding the national interest.

35. The Meng Wanzhou incident may also serve as an opportunity for judicial cooperation between China and Canada to jointly combat transnational crime.

36. In dealing with such incidents, the Government of Canada should be transparent and explain its decision-making process to the public.

37. If Canada persists in not letting people go, it may lead to China's countermeasures in the international arena and affect the global political landscape.

38. The Government of Canada needs to play an active role in international politics to maintain international order and stability.

39. The Meng Wanzhou case may also serve as an important reference for other countries in dealing with similar issues.

40. In the context of globalization, multinational enterprises should strengthen compliance management and guard against legal risks.

Read on