Editor's note: The recent launch of the P70 Pioneer plan has caused a huge heated discussion, especially about the performance of the Kirin 9010 chip, which can be said to have attracted much attention. "What do you think of the Kirin 9010 processor equipped with the Huawei Pura70 series, and the running score is not as good as the Snapdragon 8+?" Such questions emerge one after another, but the magnifying glass believes that regarding the flagship products of the Huawei series, it is better not to pay too much attention to absolute performance and price, or even to measure it at all, do people who buy it really care about price and performance? Only those who do not buy it do so mind.
"What do you think of the Kirin 9010 processor equipped with the Huawei Pura70 series, and the running score is not as good as the Snapdragon 8+?"
Huawei's Kirin processor is unlikely to catch up with the flagship processor after the Snapdragon 8+ in a short period of time.
The nature of this kind of problem is so strong that even people like me, who don't support buying Huawei products, can't stand it.
Are we buying Huawei products now because of its performance? Is it because he is invincible in the universe? Of course not, precisely because he has a lot of problems, but in the most critical part where we are eager to break through, Huawei is the only hope at the moment.
That is to say, some of us are willing to pay for this only hope, and at the same time, many users who are willing to buy Huawei P series products also recognize this brand, and are even willing to spontaneously maintain the attributes and brand premium of this brand.
Or in the future, we will really break through high-end chips, from foundry to design and even including lithography machines, many Huawei users will get great satisfaction, which itself is also within the price cost range.
At present, it is very rare for Huawei to be able to hand out a product comparable to the performance of Snapdragon 8+, which at least provides us with a feasible solution, and in extreme cases, we can also ensure that the performance of the chip does not lag too far behind.
I know that there are many users who have opinions about Huawei, and may think that Huawei's premium is too high, the performance is too weak, and the marketing may also be criticized. But to be honest, compared with these small problems, the most important thing is to be able to support Huawei's R&D and bear the consequences of this part of R&D, including allowing Huawei to survive in some cutting-edge fields.
I myself do not recommend users who are not strong in consumption, forcibly buy Huawei mobile phones, Huawei is very difficult, but it is not a shortage of three or five of your users, and the overall output of Huawei mobile phones is still insufficient, which has a strong correlation with the yield rate of chips,
As long as Huawei can continue to improve the chip, even if it is a small improvement, and with the optimization of the HarmonyOS system, it can achieve a relatively smooth experience, even if there is no redundancy in the performance of this chip.
Huawei calls on all Chinese apps to join HarmonyOS as soon as possible, what kind of industry impact and market effect does Huawei expect to achieve through this initiative?
In fact, Huawei wants to be Apple, the real other Apple, it's that simple.
There is Apple's A-series chip-Kirin, a system comparable to iOS-Hongmeng, localization that Apple does not have, image algorithms that Apple does not pay much attention to, signal performance that is far stronger than Apple's, Apple's same brand premium, and a Chinese system independent of the American technology Internet system.
For Huawei, it may not be as difficult to rewrite a version of the system as imagined, but it is very difficult to maintain the entire ecosystem. Because this ecosystem involves thousands of developers, it needs thousands of apps to cooperate, and even the distribution and compromise of benefits, which is very complex, very difficult, and very difficult to reconcile.
If it weren't for the current situation of the whole controversy and the great changes unseen in a century, before 2018, if Huawei wanted to do this thing, I am afraid that many manufacturers would refuse to cooperate with their righteous words. But now the interests of individuals and individual enterprises must give way to the overall situation, the overall situation is that the country on the other side of the Pacific is doing everything possible to suppress and restrict Chinese companies, domestic software manufacturers must take such a responsibility, must cooperate with Huawei, at least this matter must be done first, as for interests or other rules, etc., you can continue to negotiate, this is not immutable.
For example, Huawei's previous negotiations between Hongmeng and WeChat were actually more difficult, which mainly involved the interests of all parties, that is to say, whether the system manages the software or the software is independent of the system? But in the final analysis, these are only internal problems, not irreconcilable. A step back for both sides, or a compromise on both sides, and other compensation on the other side can solve the problem.
For most of our consumers, the Hongmeng system is beneficial and harmless, and the Hongmeng system is independent of Android, iOS and Microsoft Windows, and the future can actually be from the mobile terminal
Turn to the PC terminal, and even be used on some large-scale projects, not excluding some major national secret projects or some projects of the military, so I personally support the HarmonyOS system.
It is foreseeable that the Hongmeng system, as our independent system, will be able to make matching mechanisms and optimization mechanisms for our chips in the future. For example, the current Loongson
In the future, it can be reborn with the help of the HarmonyOS system, and even become the mainstream operating system within the country, which revitalizes the entire software and hardware market. And even if it is limited by the backwardness of the current manufacturing process, the foam system can still be optimized from the bottom to make up for the defects of chips and hardware at the software level, which means that we can completely ignore the sanctions of the other party under the mature Hongmeng system.
I want to reiterate once again that I personally do not support the current situation, and the working class, including manual workers, students, unemployed people, etc., forcibly rush Huawei's products, not because they do not support Huawei, but on a case-by-case basis, hoping that consumers can choose the right products with the right money. I also hope that other manufacturers can get user support, and the market in this country can accommodate Huami OV Glory Meizu and so on!
But I don't have any opinions on Huawei's systems, chips, on-board chips, intelligent cockpits, autonomous driving, communications, servers, cloud services, etc., and I support them very much and hope that they can succeed, which is not in conflict with some of the marketing models I hate about Huawei.
In the end, I really hope they succeed