Kailu County, which began to make an uproar yesterday, demanded the payment of a "supplementary contract fee" for land, and the incident of cadres obstructing spring plowing can be regarded as having a result. But with the results of the processing, new problems have arisen.
Question 1: Ji Yunhao's work experience
The arrogant and domineering deputy secretary of the political party committee Ji Yunhao has been dismissed, judging from his words and deeds in the video, there is no problem with this dismissal, but for the majority of netizens, it is not enough to be dismissed.
As his resume was dug up by netizens, questions about his employment experience also came, and I didn't bother to put the fake computer work photo that was too obvious, so I put a few doubts summarized by this netizen who claimed to be a civil servant.
1. The comrade joined the army at the age of 17 and was discharged from the army at the age of 19, and should have served as a compulsory soldier for two years.
2. What kind of work did the comrade participate in in 2012?
3. When did the comrade enter the public security department? How are the establishments and identities obtained?
4. The comrade was appointed secretary of the town party committee from the people's police, and is already a leading cadre at the civil service section level, please publicize the evaluation and promotion appointment process.
5. From the so-called transfer of jobs at the end of 2009 to the time when he joined the work in 2012, there was only a gap of 3 years.
These 5 questions are really critical, and I don't know if the relevant departments can give a positive reply.
Question 2: The nature of the land
The official website of the Kailu County Government has actually been concerned by many farmers and herdsmen as early as February this year on matters related to the change of the nature of the land of "new cultivated land", and the local government also refuted the social rumor that "illegal reclamation of forest and grassland can be turned into cultivated land" on February 5.
It can be seen that the land contract indicates that a dairy farm was built at that time, and the historical data of the "Second Land Adjustment" also shows that the grassland is mainly forest and grassland.
Regarding the change of the nature of the land, many netizens are obsessed with changing the original farmland to cultivated land, shouldn't this be a good thing?
Regarding the existence of such doubts, I think this Jilin netizen has explained it very clearly.
The original contracted forest and grassland was to conserve water and soil and protect the environment and ecology, but if the environment of Inner Mongolia is changed to cultivated land, it will cause land desertification, and this impact will be more serious.
There are many netizens who agree with such a metaphor: "After renting a rough house, after renovating it, the landlord has to collect the money according to the renovated commercial house".
First of all, I don't want to say whether this metaphor is appropriate, first of all, changing the nature of the land without authorization is already a breach of contract, and yesterday I remember that many people mentioned the word "spirit of contract", and the breach of contract is obviously not in line with the "spirit of contract"
I think the appropriate metaphor for this should be "spending money to rent a few parking spaces in the community, and then building a simple house on top of the parking space and renting it to other people as a façade".
In addition, illegal grassland reclamation constitutes a crime that must be investigated for criminal responsibility, and everyone should not treat the person who took the video as an ordinary farmer. Speaking of which, it feels a bit similar to the one who paid for the bridge out of his own pocket not long ago.
Of course, the change in the nature of the land in this case is left to the judge to make the final decision.
In fact, it is obvious that there are still some problems here, but it seems that it is inconvenient to continue to dig deeper, and we melon-eating netizens should not express our emotions in a panic first, and wait slowly to see the follow-up.
Finally, as I said before, it's normal for different people to have different opinions on a controversial matter, and it's normal to discuss it here, and I welcome it. Eating a tofu brain is divided into sweet ones, salty ones and both, right?
But the kind of firm conspiracy theories and those that are purely for venting emotions are not used to discuss, and you should not look down on people like us who are willing to discuss objectively, just build a group and have fun by yourself.