laitimes

Who can have the final say in the rural areas in "abolishing" village cadres? The three types of people have become the first choice, what do the peasants think?

author:Not obsessed with finance

Village cadres have always played an important role in rural areas: on the one hand, village cadres are able to mediate various disputes between villagers in order to maintain the stability of rural society. In addition, village cadres should also convey the policies of the higher-level government to the grass-roots peasants, and also concentrate the various demands of the grass-roots peasants and convey them to the higher-level governments. On the other hand, the village cadres should also pass on all kinds of advanced technologies and money-making experience to everyone, and lead the villagers to achieve common prosperity.

Who can have the final say in the rural areas in "abolishing" village cadres? The three types of people have become the first choice, what do the peasants think?

However, in recent years, calls for the abolition of village cadres in rural areas have become louder. There are three main reasons for this: First, many village cadres are old, but they have been relying on their posts and have not done anything or acted indiscriminately. These village cadres not only lead to the increasing scale of the village collective's debt, but also cannot lead everyone to common prosperity. And village cadres like this are often criticized by the villagers. Therefore, the call for the abolition of village cadres is getting louder and louder.

Second, some village cadres are unfair. When dealing with disputes between villagers, some village cadres always like to take sides and fail to achieve a bowl of water. In addition, these village cadres like to contract out their relatives and friends for projects such as fish ponds, fish farms, and road works in the village, and make personal profits from them. In this regard, many villagers believe that the village committee should adopt the method of bidding to select the contractor, rather than having a few village cadres have the final say.

Who can have the final say in the rural areas in "abolishing" village cadres? The three types of people have become the first choice, what do the peasants think?

Third, some village cadres bribed elections. Every time the village needs to run for village cadres, a small number of village cadres give some small favors to the villagers in order to be successfully elected. As for the villagers, whoever is a village cadre is the same, it is better to vote for the person who benefits me. In this way, mediocre people are often elected as village cadres, while those who want to make a difference and do something practical for everyone are difficult to be elected as village cadres.

Now the question arises, is it feasible to "abolish" the village cadres? In fact, it is very difficult for the villagers to fulfill this demand. Moreover, in the future, the village cadres will still have the final say in rural areas. However, the future village cadres are not the above three types of disappointing village cadres, but the following three groups of people become the first choice of village cadres:

The first category is excellent college students

Who can have the final say in the rural areas in "abolishing" village cadres? The three types of people have become the first choice, what do the peasants think?

At present, in many rural areas, outstanding local college students are selected to become village cadres. Because college students are relatively young, they are more fair and just in dealing with villagers' disputes. In addition, university graduates are more active and can bring in foreign technology and experience to lead the villagers to get rich together. For example, some university students and village officials sell local products online, providing new employment opportunities for the local community and increasing the income of rural residents. Therefore, it is very popular for outstanding college students to return to their hometowns to become village officials.

The second category is the leaders of rural prosperity

Who can have the final say in the rural areas in "abolishing" village cadres? The three types of people have become the first choice, what do the peasants think?

Some villagers have been working hard outside for many years and have their own businesses. Others have become wealthy local people by setting up farms and growing high value-added agricultural products. And people like this, who work hard to get out of poverty and achieve financial freedom, may become village cadres.

Because, this kind of person has a flexible mind, and has the technology and experience of related industries, and has some original accumulation in his hands. If such people can become village cadres, they can not only provide more jobs, but also pass on their successful experience and skills to everyone, and help the villagers achieve common prosperity.

The third category is rural elites

Who can have the final say in the rural areas in "abolishing" village cadres? The three types of people have become the first choice, what do the peasants think?

Like some retired cadres, civil servants, veterans, veteran teachers and other groups, they are also expected to become village cadres. At the same time, they can quickly convey the policies of higher-level government departments to the grassroots, and then convey the demands of the villagers at the grassroots level, playing the role of a bridge. Therefore, such rural elites are also very popular with the villagers.