Regarding the "spring ploughing incident" in Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Village, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, on April 24, 2024, Kailu County released the latest investigation statement, which mainly answered two questions.
■Let's start with the first update:
Everyone should pay attention to the "new cultivated land to collect paid use fees", Shuangsheng Village in accordance with the policy requirements, the implementation of the "four discussions and two open" procedures, the formation of the villagers' representative meeting resolution, but also publicized, no one raised objections during the publicity period, in the resolution clearly mentioned that the paid use fee of 200 yuan per mu is charged, and the cost is allocated and used by the village collective.
That is to say, if the farmland contractor has a problem and wants to give feedback or disagree with the "new farmland to collect paid use fees", it should be raised during the resolution publicity period, if there is no objection, it means that it agrees with the validity of the resolution, then it should pay the fee in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the resolution. If you don't pay the fee, of course the government department has the right to ask you to suspend the cultivation of the land, and you can only cultivate the land after negotiation, which is a reasonable request.
■Let's take a look at the second update:
Let's take a closer look, the farmer we are concerned about, Zhang Mouzhu, is not a villager of Shuangsheng Village, and the original lease of the plot was to build a dairy farm and for forage planting, and a lease contract of 5,600 mu was signed, at that time the price per mu was 4 yuan per year. Later, he didn't care about it, and gave the leased land to his brother Zhang Moulin (Shenzhen) to operate.
For the sake of economic interests, Zhang Moulin privately changed the original 4,650 mu of grassland into cultivated land without permission, and subleased most of the new cultivated land to others at a price of at least 700 yuan per mu.
If you still don't understand, let me give you an analogy:
It is equivalent to someone who deceives the government into signing a land transaction agreement in the name of building a factory or using industrial land, and we know that the price of industrial land is very low. Now the government is asking him to compensate for the land transfer fee for commercial and residential land, but he is unwilling to pay and makes trouble with the media.
This is the ins and outs of Zhang Mouzhu and Zhang Moulin, who defrauded the right to use grassland to build a dairy farm at a very low price, changed the land use attributes without authorization, turned it into cultivated land, and then subleased it to others for personal gain!
We calculate at a price of 700 yuan per mu, and most of them are subleased to others, and we calculate most of them according to 70%, that is, the annual rental cost is:
(5600*70%)*700=2,744,000 yuan
More than 2.7 million! Putting aside the fact that the land lease contract he signed in the name of grassland at that time was 4 yuan per mu, everyone thinks about how high their profits are!
At present, the counties, towns, and villages have not pursued the problem of changing their land attributes without permission, but have only asked them to pay 200 yuan/mu for the effective use of the new cultivated land, which is owned by the village collective, which is completely reasonable and reasonable!
The pasture was turned into cultivated land, and it was subcontracted by Zhang's brother to others for profit
■Final Words:
We often say that we should let the bullets fly for a while, we should give people more time and space to deal with this matter, and we should not see the wind or rain, and now the truth of the matter is becoming clearer and clearer.
It can only be said that Zhang Mouzhu and Zhang Moulin, with their own private alliance with the farmers who subleased their farmland, misled the media and the public who did not know the truth, we did not see Zhang Mouzhu and Zhang Moulin appear in the video released by China's Sannong, that is to say, they hid behind the scenes and remotely controlled the farmers they subleased to mislead the media and the public, they are the bosses, and they should pay the money themselves, but they transfer this fee to the farmers who lease their land, which is completely unreasonable.
Moreover, is it possible to hold Zhang Mouzhu and Zhang Moulin accountable for "changing the attributes of land without authorization and requiring them to fulfill the responsibility of returning farmland to grassland and returning farmland to forests"? However, since they have already been converted into cultivated land, increased commercial use, subleased, and restored to their original appearance, the risk and cost are too great, and now the government requires them to fulfill the effective use fee of 200 yuan per mu for the new land, and we should give full support!
If you have anything to say about this, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss.