(1) The real incident is spicy, and the deputy secretary of the town has become a "domineering landlord"?
Have you swiped that video that is popular all over the Internet? It is a real and realistic version of the "stupid son of the landlord's family"! However, the identity of this "landlord" is a bit special -- he is a deputy secretary of Jianhua Town, Kailu County, and the "tenants" he faces are our simple and unpretentious peasant brothers.
In the video, this "domineering landlord" forcibly prevents the peasants from cultivating their own land, and the momentum, that posture, is the appearance of the bully in the movie!
(2) Let's not rush to shoot bricks first, listen to what the official has to say
Originally, when the big guys saw this video, they must have been furious, and the keyboard warriors are estimated to have sharpened their knives and prepared to spray. However, the plot suddenly took a 180-degree turn! Kailu County officials issued a briefing, saying that there was another hidden story in this matter.
It turned out that Jianhua Town was a pilot unit for the efficient use of new cultivated land, and the deputy secretary did not want to take the opportunity to make oil and water, but implemented a policy called "additional contract fees". It's just that his communication method is really lacking in fire, and his attitude is a bit "arrogant", which makes people mistakenly think that he is bullying honest people.
(3) Can the contract fee be supplemented? The peasants are confused
What is the reason for the supplementary contract fee? I guess many of my friends are like me, and they have heard of it for the first time. To put it simply, it's like you rent a rough house and spend your own money to decorate it, only to have the landlord suddenly come to you and say, "Hey, the house has appreciated, the rent has to go up!"
The peasant brothers have worked hard to transform the saline-alkali land into fertile land, and now they suddenly have to pay more money, can they not be blocked? Isn't this the same reason that the tenant is being given additional rent?
(4) Legal experts will come to support and policy interpretation will go through a wave
Having said that, we can't conclude that this supplementary contract fee is unreasonable just based on feelings, after all, people have officially said that there is a basis for this. In order to find out the situation, I specially invited a big name in the legal field and asked him to tell us about the legal logic behind this.
As soon as the big coffee spoke, it was really unusual: "According to the relevant provisions of the Rural Land Contract Law, the land contract relationship is stable and long-term, but it does not rule out reasonable adjustment of the contract fee under specific conditions. "Look, what people say is reasonable, we can't be killed with a rod, right?
(5) Who will protect the rights and interests of farmers on the balance beam?
Okay, the policy is legal, but we can't ignore the feelings of the peasant brothers. They have put so much effort into improving the land, and now they suddenly have to pay more out of their pockets, and they are not happy to put it on anyone.
Therefore, the question arises: Under the new policy of promoting the efficient use of land, how can we implement the policy well and protect the rights and interests of the peasants? Do you say, should there be a clear compensation mechanism so that the peasants' upfront investment can be reasonably rewarded? Or should the policymakers be more down-to-earth, listen to the peasants' voices, and not clean up some "castles in the air"?
(6) What do you think about you in front of the screen?
After talking so much, my mouth is dry. What do you think? Should this supplementary contract fee be charged? How much should be charged? Also, what do you think should be done with the attitude of the deputy secretary? Come on, come on, let me listen to your voice! Remember, we are all "melon-eating masses," but we are also "melon-eating masses" with thoughts and attitudes!
(7) Improve services, farmers: protect their rights and interests, and work together to build a harmonious land order
Finally, I would like to say that while promoting the policy, can we also improve the service attitude, so as not to make our peasant brothers feel like they are begging grandpa to sue grandma? After all, a harmonious land-use order requires everyone to work together, don't you say?
Okay, that's all for today's "social tea party", let's talk next time! Remember to like and share, so that more people can pay attention to these social hotspots related to our vital interests!