Recently, a news in Kailu County has attracted widespread attention:
The issue of charging paid use fees (i.e., supplementary contracting fees) for new cultivated land has become the focus of heated discussions among netizens.
This seemingly simple issue of fees and charges actually involves multiple considerations of land policy, contract relations, and farmers' interests.
In this regard, on April 24, Kailu County responded again!
Today, let's take a look at the rights and wrongs of this and see if the 200 supplement fee should be charged!
What's the deal with the new arable land?
As a pilot unit for the efficient use of new cultivated land, the government has put forward a principle for the new cultivated land: it will no longer be contracted to households, but will be managed by collective economic organizations in a unified manner.
To put it simply, it is to unify the management of those newly added cultivated land that has not confirmed rights, so that the land can play a greater role. That's the right idea, and everyone supports it.
Why is there a 200 supplement fee?
It all started in 2004, when the contractors of Shuangsheng Village rented 5,600 acres of meadows and planned to do a good job.
Originally, the local farmers signed a 30-year contract with the relevant departments, and the fees had already been paid twice. It can be seen from the receipts that the first time was 96,000 yuan in 2015, and the second time was a total of 62,000 yuan in 2022!
According to this calculation, 5,600 acres of land, 30 years, only 0.94 yuan per mu per year! To be honest, this price is really low!
In the past 20 years, the contractors have worked hard to pull soil to fill in the pits and use cow dung to nourish the land, turning the wasteland into a good place to grow crops. But just before this year's spring ploughing, the village cadres suddenly jumped out and said that they would pay a "supplementary contract fee", which made the contractors confused.
It turns out that the "supplementary contract fee" is due to a change in the nature of the land, and when it was originally contracted, most of it was saline-alkali land and grassland, and the original contract was also clearly rented for the construction of dairy farms and forage planting, but now it has been turned into cultivated land by the contractors without permission.
The government believes that the contractor has changed the lease use (the nature of the land) and is suitable for the concept of new cultivated land in the new policy!
As soon as this happened, the contractors quit, feeling that they had worked hard to improve the land, and in the end they would be swept away by the government. So, the two sides were on the bar, and you said a word to me, and there was a lot of trouble.
But in this matter, the Kailu County Government is not a vegetarian, and it quickly responded. The government said that the supplementary fee was not collected arbitrarily, but was based on the policy, and the newly added cultivated land had to be used for compensation.
Contractors subcontract 700 acres of land?
However, the most dissatisfied thing for local farmers and the government is that, according to the government's investigation, the contractor has subleased most of the land, and the sublease fee is 700 per mu, which is much higher than the compensation fee of 200 per mu for the new cultivated land!
In response to this, netizens exploded!
Netizen "Air-to-air battle"
Some netizens still don't buy this response, thinking that they are just watching others make money!
Another netizen said: You rented it for 5 yuan, and if you rent it for another 700 acres, can you lose money?
The first netizen then retorted: Turning grassland into cultivated land is not something that can be changed with a single mouth, but only by investing manpower and material resources! If you think 5 yuan a mu is cheap, don't rent it back then!
Finally, a netizen seemed to end the debate, saying:
Are you right to agree with the blogger's view that "the 200 yuan supplement fee should indeed be paid by farmers!"?
Photo: Xiao Youyou's life diary
#官方再通报 "Pay money for farming" incident##拦春耕被免干部学历造假?Official response##央媒: Paying money for farming can't be a foolish account##开鲁县: Prohibit anyone from stopping agricultural machinery from going to the ground##学者: What's wrong with the village collective's charge for new cultivated land##阻拦春耕 Who did the cadres hurt by "collecting money"##网友: What is the background of the political and legal committee members who don't understand the law##头条创作挑战赛#