On April 23, the fire of the NBA playoffs was ignited again, and the matchup between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Nuggets became the focus. In the first half, the Lakers once suppressed the opponent with a lead of more than 20 points, and the fans were full of confidence in the team's strong strength. They shouted passionately from the sidelines, expecting victory.
However, the key moments of the game dealt them a heavy blow. Murray's strike left everyone stunned. While the thick eyebrows struggled to block, Murray's outstanding performance was astounding.
James, on the other hand, tried to turn the tide with powerful shots, sweating it out on the court, but it seemed like it was too late. When the game ended, Lakers fans were heartbroken, they didn't expect to lose the game in such a way.
What caused the Lakers' fiasco? After Murray hit the gamer, NBA reporters began to question whether James had committed a foul.
Fans watching the game from the sidelines also expressed their dissatisfaction, believing that the referee was biased in favor of the opponent. They protested loudly, hoping to change the course of the game, but it was all in vain.
The referee factor became a hot topic in this game. Immediately after Murray's kill, NBA reporters began to question whether James had committed a foul, believing that the referee's decision could make the difference in the outcome of the game.
On social media, public opinion is also divided into two factions. Some fans believed that the referees were not biased in favor of the Lakers, but that the Nuggets were more dominant in the game, which sparked widespread debate.
On November 23, 2016, the Nuggets were in the spotlight when they hosted the Chicago Bulls. Jamal Murray shone in the game, contributing 24 points and six rebounds to set a new career single-game scoring record.
That result also made him the 2016 rookie's top scorer in a single game, with previous record holders being Jaylen Brown and Jamal Murray, who recorded 19 points.
Social media was filled with appreciation and congratulations for Jamal Murray's performance. On Weibo, a fan posted: "Murray is too strong! His performance is amazing, win glory for the Nuggets!"
Another fan shared Murray's game stats in a WeChat group and said, "The MVP of this game is none other than Murray, and his performance is the key to the team's victory!"
And for the Nuggets' victory, it also sparked heated discussions among fans. On the forum, some fans said: "The Nuggets played really well today, especially Murray, his performance is eye-catching!"
Another netizen also posted the joy of the Nuggets winning the game in the circle of friends: "Tonight's game is so exciting, the Nuggets' victory is our pride!"
Jamal Murray's prominence has also received media attention. News reports praised him for his individual ability and teamwork during the game, which was a great addition to the team. His performance was more than just a win in one match, it was a milestone in his career.
On Weibo, some netizens said: "Murray killed that shot, James obviously fouled! The referee is so unfair!" They believe that this penalty directly affects the direction of the game, and it is not surprising that the Lakers lost the game. But there are also those who disagree
One fan wrote: "The referees are not wrong, the Nuggets are the real winners! They have been leading the game, and the Lakers are just flukes ahead." ”
After the game, the Lakers also began to reflect. Russell and Ham questioned the coach's decision-making, arguing that the coaching staff should have challenged the referee's decision more decisively.
In the WeChat group, some fans began to discuss this topic. Someone said: "The Lakers lost not all of the referee's fault, the coach is also responsible! They didn't challenge the referee in time and missed the opportunity to change the trend of the game." ”
Head coach Hamm also expressed his opinion in the interview. He acknowledged the existence of the controversial decision but stressed that the team could not use it as an excuse. In the WeChat group, some fans supported Hamm's position, believing that the team should accept the referee's decision, instead of complaining and making excuses.
On February 21, 1997, the news that Darvin Ham was traded to the Indiana Pacers caught the attention of fans. On social media, one fan said: "Ham left the Lakers, I hope he can have a better development with the Pacers!", and another fan wrote on Weibo: "Come on, Pacers! ”
As time went on, Ham finally made his Pacers debut on April 13. In the game against the Toronto Raptors, Ham came off the bench for four minutes, contributing three points and one steal. It wasn't long, but it was a moment of great significance to Hamm.
Fans also expressed their blessings and expectations for Hamm's debut. On the team's official forum, a fan left a message: "Ham scored on his debut with the Pacers, it's amazing!"
Hopefully he can find his place on his new team!" Another fan shared a video of Hamm's scoring in a WeChat group and said, "Hamm's debut is amazing, come on!"
Hamm's debut was also covered in the media. The news praised him for showing his quality and ability in his short playing time, which is a big hope for the future of the team.
This debut was not only an affirmation of Hamm personally, but also a big win for the Pacers.
The loss has raised concerns about the future of the Lakers. On the fan forums, some people began to question the team's decision to choose a young coach.
One netizen wrote: "Ham may not be a good fit for a team like the Lakers! If they go out in the first round of the playoffs, he could be fired." "This has sparked concerns and discussions among fans about the future of the team.
In such a high-profile game, the referee's decision, the team's performance and the coach's decision-making were all the focus of discussion.
Regardless of the outcome, this match will go on to be one of the talking points for a long time, leaving a deep mark.
Welcome to leave your valuable comments and opinions in the comment area, and look forward to discussing with you.
Note: It is not easy to be original, plagiarism and manuscript washing, and it will be studied deeply. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete