laitimes

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

author:Hu said nonsense

The cadres at the village and town levels in Kailu County hindered the villagers' spring ploughing, threatening to pay money if they wanted to farm, and it was useless to come to 110. The city management seized the agricultural machinery, and the police took away the villagers, which not only made people feel angry, but also touched the bottom line of the country.

As the incident gradually fermented, the local county government issued three notices in a row, and it took only one day to find out the whole story of the incident, and the relevant responsible persons were even more thoroughly investigated.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

Arable land is blocked

According to a report released by China Sannong, villagers in Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Township, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, were obstructed by local village and town cadres during spring ploughing.

The village officials said that the farmland no longer belonged to the local villagers, and the villagers took out the contract and said that they would pay a one-time contract fee for 30 years in 2022.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

But village officials said that the nature of the land had changed, and that villagers who wanted to continue farming would have to pay a fee of 200 yuan per mu, otherwise they would not be allowed to farm.

Seeing that the farming season was about to pass, the villagers were anxious. Some villagers hired agricultural machinery to work in the fields, but the village cadres sent people to the fields to obstruct them, and the people stood in front of the agricultural machinery and refused to let them go, or drove their cars directly into the fields.

The village cadres are shameless enough to be scoundrels, but I didn't expect the secretary of the town political and legal committee to "play a good hand". The secretary of the political and legal committee took the city management and the people from the police station to the field together.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

The people who commanded the city management seized the agricultural machinery, and then asked the police to take some of the villagers away. After this operation, the villagers did not dare to continue farming.

There was no way, the villagers could only report to the town government. The secretary of the political and legal committee said that the matter was not in their hands, and asked the villagers to go to the police, and said that he did not understand the law.

After this toss, the farmers were completely "confused", who should we find for farming?

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

Two circulars were issued in succession

After the incident was exposed, the local county government issued a statement on April 22 saying that it had learned of the incident and set up an investigation team to thoroughly investigate the incident.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

Subsequently, on April 23, the local county government issued a circular, explaining the cause of the incident, promising that there would be no more obstruction of farming, and finally punished the relevant responsible persons.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

In this briefing, there are a few points that deserve attention:

1. In the pilot work of new cultivated land, some large cultivated land households are unwilling to pay fees, resulting in the comparison psychology of farmers who have already paid the fees

2. The people of the village agree to claim their rights and interests by means of litigation

The first point is to explain the reason why the village cadres obstruct farming, that is, some villagers pay fees and some do not, which gives rise to the psychology of comparison, and thus produces the behavior of hindering the ploughing of land.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

For this explanation, it is somewhat general. In the report, the people who obstructed the land removal were village cadres and town cadres, and now it is said that the villagers are comparing with each other, could it be that other villagers have contracted this land and come to report to the village and town government, so there is such a thing?

In the second point, it promised that it would no longer hinder the villagers' farming behavior, but it also mentioned the use of litigation to assert their rights. This sentence, which seems to be very short, contains a lot of information.

The county government reported that the cadres prevented the villagers from farming: the deputy mayor was dismissed, and the villagers could not return to their fields

First of all, there is no problem with this year's planting, but it is difficult to say what will be the case next year; There is a big doorway in this, whether this land is given to the villagers, if the fee of 200 yuan is still needed, and how to compensate if it is not given.

Now, at this point in time, the matter has been resolved. The villagers' farming has been guaranteed, and those responsible have been punished.

But what about the follow-up? How should the people be guaranteed to farm the land, and whether similar problems will arise, this is the focus of our attention. I hope that the relevant media will continue to pay attention to it and give an explanation to the local people.

The above analysis is only a personal opinion and is for reference only, so don't take it seriously