Text: Entertainment Xiaojing
Edit|Entertainment Xiaojing
Preface
On April 23, 2024, a news about short video blogger Li Minxuan illegally self-reporting his name in the re-examination of the acting department of Beijing Film Academy has aroused widespread public attention.
Loading...
Li Minxuan, an internet celebrity with more than 5 million followers, was officially canceled for his audition results during the art exam.
The incident went viral on social media, causing heated discussions.
In this regard, Li Minxuan's father said that the family will clarify the truth of the incident and explain why his son disclosed personal information in violation of regulations in the Nortel examination room.
This matter is not only about a person's future, but also touches on the fairness of the art examination.
As soon as the topic was posted on the Internet, the comment area instantly exploded! Tens of thousands of comments poured in
Some of these netizens' comments are even more interesting and interesting, let's take a look
Netizen: Don't scold Li Minxuan anymore, she just did the wrong person and didn't do the right thing
The art of speaking haha
Netizen: Li Minxuan, we'll see you in college
She's an art exam
Netizen: Why didn't the examiner stop cheating in the exam [listen to the song] Now that it has come out, the examiner will not be affected
I'm talking about the cheating and the examiner's cheating
Netizen: Then if the person who is replaced is looking for someone to cry to
It's all hammered [covering face]
Netizen: I don't understand what happened, don't make any evaluation, Beijing Film Academy will give a fair result
It did violate
Netizen: I know that I can't say my name in an interview
Isn't it an interview, if you know what you look like, you can give a high score?
Editor's opinion
Li Minxuan's irregularities in the re-examination process of the Performance Department of the Beijing Film Academy, and the widespread attention and discussion it aroused, reflect the problems existing in the selection process of contemporary art education and the public's high concern about the fairness of higher art education. This incident not only affected Li Minxuan's personal career prospects, but also stimulated in-depth thinking on the social level about the selection criteria and transparency of art schools.
First of all, Li Minxuan's behavior violated the basic rules and principles of fairness in the art examination. In highly competitive art exams, fairness is paramount. All candidates are expected to be assessed under the same conditions, and any form of privilege or prior disclosure of personal information may interfere with the objectivity of the assessment. The incident highlighted the potential injustices that celebrities or influencers can bring about in public examinations, raising questions about the fairness of the examinations.
Second, the widespread discussion sparked by this incident shows that the public has a strong concern about educational equity. As an important field for cultivating creative and expressive talents, the legitimacy of the selection process of art education is directly related to the fair distribution of educational resources. The public's interest in the case reflects the expectation of equality in education and the vigilance of any possible erosion of this principle.
Moreover, the statement of Li Minxuan's father, which intends to clarify the reasons behind the incident, also shows the complexity of dealing with crises and responding to public concerns in public events. This behavior shows that when an individual's behavior is widely concerned by the public and the media, how the person involved and his or her family responds in an open and transparent way will directly affect the public's understanding and judgment of the incident.
In addition, the incident also poses a challenge to the selection mechanism of art academies. How to effectively identify and select students with real artistic talent and potential while ensuring the fairness of selection is a problem that the art education community must face. This is not only about the design and implementation of exams, but also about a deep understanding of the value and goals of art education.
To sum up, the Li Minxuan incident is not only an isolated case of examination violations, but also a social incident that touches on the essence of educational equity, social justice and art education. It reflects society's general concern for educational equity, a critical scrutiny of celebrities' behavior in the public sphere, and an expectation of transparency and fairness in the selection mechanism for arts education. As this event develops further and clarifies are clarified, the public will continue to pay attention to how the field of arts education responds to these challenges to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of its selection process.
Thank you for reading, those who have money hold a money field, those who don't have money hold a personal field, I wish you all a day in the gold, happy every day
#网红艺考生回应被指北电艺考作弊##评论##头条创作挑战赛##网友#