The incident of cadres in Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, blocking spring ploughing caused an uproar on the Internet, and the Kailu County Government issued two "circulars" in succession, revealing the truth of the matter.
Previously, there were media reports that two large contracted planters in Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Town, Kailu County, were prevented by the deputy director of the village committee from carrying out spring plowing in their contracted land.
The reason for the obstruction is that the growers are required to pay a "land appreciation fee" of 200 yuan per mu, and if they do not pay the money, they are not allowed to plough the land.
The deputy director also said aggressively: "110 is coming, what is the matter, I will collect money if I am asked to collect money", and said that they are implementing the decision of the town government.
When the contractor went to the town government to find a leader to evaluate, Ji Mouhao, who is the deputy secretary of the party committee and a member of the political and legal committee of Jianhua Town, actually said: "What does this have to do with the town government, don't look for me, I don't understand the law!"
Moreover, the deputy secretary also personally went to the field to guide the work, and shouted to the growers who were ready to plough the land, "You are robbing collective resources"!
The incident was reported by the media, which caused huge public opinion on the Internet and immediately brought the local government to the forefront.
Kailu County officials issued a notice in the early morning of April 23, saying that a meeting had been held to set up a working group to conduct an investigation, and the results would be announced to the public based on the results.
On the evening of April 23, the local government issued a second "circular", showing that the local government is very efficient and able to respond to the concerns of netizens in a timely manner.
This report is very informative, and it can be interpreted from the report that the previous reports of growers and the media have certain limitations and one-sidedness, and do not show the whole picture of the whole incident.
There is a problem of pinching the head and removing the tail. One-sided emphasis on "cadres blocking spring ploughing", but not mentioning the fact that most of the local villagers and growers have already paid the contract fee.
After reading the briefing, I came to the following two analyses:
1. Kailu County, as a pilot unit designated by the higher authorities, has carried out a pilot project on the efficient use of cultivated land, and the "supplementary contracting fee" is a way to take the pilot work of new cultivated land. It is the village collective that collects paid use fees for the newly added cultivated land.
This shows that the grass-roots governments at the village and town levels are implementing the relevant national policies, which are based on the law, and are not arbitrarily collecting fees without permission, but also for the effective value-added of the national land policy.
2. Regarding the problem of "blocking and not allowing farming" on the Internet, the current situation is that most of the villagers who have contracted farmland have paid the "supplementary contract fee" in response to the government's call.
However, a very small number of farmers with a particularly large area of contracted arable land refuse to pay this fee for their own interests.
As a result, the vast majority of villagers who have already paid the fees feel that it is unreasonable, and they cannot only collect the money they have contracted from small households, while these large planters who have contracted several thousand mu do not pay the money.
Therefore, the vast majority of villagers spontaneously approached these two large contractors and demanded that they also pay, which coincided with the content of one of the videos.
There is a video showing a villager arguing with a large planter sitting in front of a planter.
The circular said that at present, it has been resolved through the coordination of the county, town, and village governments, and the masses have agreed to adopt the method of litigation to claim their rights and interests to resolve contradictions and ensure that farming will not be delayed.
From the above two analyses, it can be concluded that Lao Zhang, a large contracted planter, is not a fuel-efficient lamp.
In the case that most of the villagers have paid the "supplementary contract fee", just because the land contracted by them in the village is a large household, as high as 4,560 mu, if calculated at 200 per mu, they will have to pay nearly 100,000 yuan a year.
So I thought about it and didn't want to pay this fee. Twenty years ago, the price of contracted land was calculated on the basis of wasteland, which was almost free of charge, and the state also had various preferential subsidies for contracted land growers.
Even if Lao Zhang and a very small number of people said that a lot of money has been invested in these years to improve the nature of the land, the cost should have been recovered long ago, and the current land contract is more than 1,000 yuan per mu.
At the beginning, the state contracted according to the stalls, and it was estimated that each mu was no more than 50 yuan, so that Lao Zhang and other large contractors had already earned huge profits.
Change the nature of the land
The key point is that the previous contract, which was written to grow non-cash crops, has now become irrigated land, and corn and other cash crops have been planted, which has changed the nature of land use.
There is no problem at all in the state adjusting according to the land policy and reasonably collecting the fee for the appreciation of the land, not to mention that this fee is handed over to the state treasury.
In order to gain greater private interests, individual large contractors represented by Lao Zhang do not consider the state's land policy, but want to take advantage of the state, and in turn take advantage of the sympathy of the media and netizens.
Similar to the Sun Guoyou incident
This is exactly the same as last year's Sun Guoyou "kneeling on the ground and begging for water" incident, which is completely cutting off the head and removing the tail, only picking the side that is beneficial to him, but hiding his unreasonable side.
Last year, Sun Guoyou initially used the Internet and the sympathy of netizens to play the sad card, but it was finally exposed, which surprised many netizens.
Everything must be realistic, why the vast majority of villagers can pay fees, but only a few large contractors such as Lao Zhang are unwilling to pay.
At the beginning, the state gave them such a platform, and now they have made money, but they still have no tongue and want to earn greater benefits.
And this money is precisely built on the premise of harming the interests of the state's land, and such a large contractor is not worthy of sympathy at all, and in turn should be criticized by the public.