The Internet is all about the voice of e-commerce, afraid of e-commerce monopoly, afraid of the widening gap between the rich and the poor, afraid of economic depression and unemployment, you can crazy to add drama to yourself, but reality will not accompany you to act, e-commerce to the people to bring courier positions, both the number and salary are higher than the waiters in physical stores, it is meaningless to pretend to be crazy and stupid.
I'm very curious, why do you say that e-commerce will make people unemployed? What are the jobs given to ordinary people in the era of physical stores, which are nothing more than waiters and store assistants. And the low wages of these two positions are really unseeable, and they can't survive 4,000. On the other hand, the position of e-commerce to the people is a courier, and it costs four or five thousand a month, and the judgment is made without too much explanation. On the one hand, the post wages of e-commerce to the people have increased, and on the other hand, the price of goods given by e-commerce to the people has decreased. With a two-pronged approach, people who vote with their feet know that 10,000 physical stores are not as good as e-commerce.
The real unemployed are landlords and brick-and-mortar store owners, and e-commerce companies have stripped off their bottoms, giving ordinary consumers a first taste of what it means to be a customer, not a grandson. Many netizens said: E-commerce will squeeze factories, so the price of products is low. I wondered very much, wouldn't the brick-and-mortar store squeeze the factory? The brick-and-mortar store didn't want to lower the purchase price? If you use your brain a little, you know that this is ridiculous, it's nonsense at all. E-commerce is to divide the money of the landlord and the physical store owner with the people, the e-commerce takes the big head, the people take the small head, and the people get the benefits, which is 10,000 times stronger than the physical store.
Landlords and brick-and-mortar store owners can also be couriers to run logistics, but ordinary people can be couriers, and they can't be expensive if they are noble. There is no difference between e-commerce and physical stores, both sell goods, and they all have to buy from factories, which has no impact on the real economy, but the efficiency of the Internet is too high, which makes the competition more fierce and accelerates the speed of survival of the fittest. And a large number of factories couldn't adapt to this speed for a while, and they panicked all of a sudden.
E-commerce is more friendly to the people than physical stores, physical stores you don't use a lot of money can not easily make a fortune, high rent and commodity payments, less goods are not enough to sell, more financial pressure, once the explosion of replenishment will take a while. E-commerce is different, there is no supply and zero rent, and ordinary people have the opportunity to participate in this redistribution of wealth. This is a bit like the taste of buying lottery tickets, the randomness of the opportunity for civilians to change their lives, because of the shouting: the Great Wall cannon! wealth is rolling in, ordinary people in the era of e-commerce, the probability of making a fortune, is much higher than the era of physical stores, which is 10,000 times stronger than physical stores.
The physical store is more like the feudal system of the old era, paying attention to the hereditary system, the hypermarket and the big shopping mall are the inner circle of the landlord, and the ordinary people can not easily insert their feet, they can only be exploited from generation to generation, as a waiter, receiving a salary of more than 3,000, but they have to go to the high-priced physical store to pay tribute to the landlord and the boss, the boss looks at people with his nostrils, and loves to buy or not to buy the arrogance. Do you miss this kind of brick-and-mortar store? Do you enjoy this kind of brick-and-mortar shopping feeling? You tell the boss to return the product for no reason within 7 days, and the boss tells you to go home and go over the first seven. In terms of service, e-commerce is 10,000 times stronger than physical stores, do you have any opinions?
Saying that e-commerce will be eliminated and the real economy will be restored is a fallacy in itself. Is e-commerce not the real economy, but the financial economy?
It is a fallacy that e-commerce will make people unemployed. Physical stores can only give more than 3,000 waiter jobs to ordinary people, but the couriers of e-commerce are four or five thousand a month.
E-commerce will make the economy depressed, and the fallacy can no longer be fallacious. According to this theory, Africa's economy should be more prosperous than that of developed countries in the West, at least more prosperous than China! But what is the reality, I don't need to say! Not to mention Africa, even if the European and American economies are compared with each other, we will not be intimidated.
If you want me to say that ordinary people can shop online with peace of mind, go to the factory to make screws as couriers, and happily eat melons next to them to see how the landlord jumps. E-commerce subsidizes the landlord's money into the commodity, and we ordinary people don't take it for nothing. If you are afraid of the monopoly of e-commerce, isn't it terrible to monopolize the physical store? Once e-commerce dares to monopolize price increases, believe it or not, brick-and-mortar stores will spring up everywhere like mushrooms after a rain.