After returning home from her visit to China, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen did not remember China's warm hospitality at all, and turned her head to detain a "cauldron" on China, saying that she "will not give up any possible options" on the production capacity of China's manufacturing industry, which means that she will use any "tool" to contain China, and even does not rule out the possibility of another trade war. It is worth noting that recently, a number of senior U.S. officials led by Yellen have frequently hyped up the issue of "China's overcapacity" in public opinion, exaggerated the so-called "economic threat" from China, and called on the United States and Europe to boycott China. In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying resolutely responded by posting a series of posts on US social media.
Citing the views of Jeffrey, a well-known American economist, Hua Chunying analyzed the United States' erroneous perception of China, the issue of production capacity, the United States' strategy, and China-US relations, and exposed the hegemonic behavior of the United States in fabricating charges in an attempt to deprive China of its right to development. On the issue of so-called "overcapacity", Hua Chunying emphasized that China's competitive advantage in the field of new energy has been achieved through a combination of early strategic planning, continuous R&D investment, well-established industrial and supply chains, a super-large domestic market, a diligent labor force and many enterprising enterprises. In addition, in the framework of the Paris Agreement, the global green capacity is not "excessive" but "seriously insufficient", and the United States slanders "China's overcapacity" as a new "narrative trap".
Under the situation that the West has the right to global public opinion, the battlefield selected by Biden is very precise and can be said to be the home of the United States, and Hua Chunying's use of the United States' social platforms to fight back is by no means for the sake of a momentary speed, but also about the game between China and the United States in the battlefield of public opinion. Looking back on history, the United States has played countless "narrative traps" against China, from the so-called "China threat", "tracing the origin of the epidemic" to "human rights issues", "Hong Kong National Security Law", and now "China's 'debt trap' and "overcapacity" to Africa.
Most of the real top-level political games start with public opinion warfare, and the United States and the Soviet Union struggle for hegemony is a typical example, the United States calls this kind of public opinion warfare "peaceful evolution", after the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was transformed into a "color revolution", and now it is also called "cognitive warfare", but the ultimate goal is to serve politics. The highest level of public opinion warfare is to achieve the result of the enemy being chaotic, self-defeating, and even self-defeating without using swords, but in order to fight a public opinion war well, it is not a "conspiracy" but a "conspiracy" that can stand the test of time and facts, and cause the enemy to be confused and divided in his thinking. Judging from the various practices of the United States, this is clearly not a good idea.
The United States wants to fight, and China will accompany it to the end. China's public counterattack against the United States has begun, focusing on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, with the international community as the main battlefield and, more specifically, the UN Security Council. Based on Israel's brutality of civilians in Gaza and the bottomless protection of the United States, the international community is building a united front against the United States and Israel, and the so-called "human rights" and "double standard" mask of the United States have been completely torn off, and the United States has gradually lost international support. Most typically, the United States abstained from voting on a draft call for a temporary ceasefire in Gaza, and its Western allies voted in favor of it. This is not only a victory for China, but also a victory for the international anti-hegemonic camp, and it also means that the "stick of public opinion" of the United States is gradually becoming ineffective.