In the workplace, everyone has their own roles and rules.
Recently, an Jiyue employee named "Da Yao Tok" was fired from the company for buying Xiaomi SU7, which has attracted widespread attention from the society.
Behind this is a contest between workplace ethics and brand loyalty, as well as a conflict between personal choice and the interests of the company.
Jiyue employees were fired for buying Xiaomi cars, and the company accused the company of violating professional ethics, absenteeism, and promoting competing products
He was fired because of the non-compete rules, which caused controversy among netizens
In this era of information explosion, social media has become the birthplace of all kinds of stories.
A story about an employee of Jiyue who was fired after buying a Xiaomi SU7 car quickly caused an uproar on the Internet.
This incident not only touched the sensitive nerves of the public about the boundary between employees' personal freedom and corporate rules and regulations, but also reflected deep-seated issues such as corporate culture and professional ethics.
The turmoil caused by the purchase of a car by employees
It started with a man named "Da Yao Tok" who posted multiple videos on Weibo and Douyin about his ordeal.
He said that five days after buying the Xiaomi car SU7, that is, on the afternoon of April 9, he was suddenly fired from his company, Jiyue Automobile, and the process and reason for the dismissal shocked and puzzled him.
He even broke the news that the reason for firing him turned out to be because he violated the company's non-compete rules, which made the whole incident immediately a hot topic and attracted the attention and discussion of a large number of netizens.
The company's official response
In the face of the growing controversy, Jiyue Automobile finally issued an official statement through the Ministry of Justice on April 17, giving the company's official view of the incident.
In the statement, the company emphasized that it was not because the employee was dismissed for purchasing Xiaomi cars, but because the employee continued to promote the Xiaomi brand in his position, that is, the media operation position, and had multiple unexcused absenteeism and posted content unrelated to the company during working hours, which seriously affected the company's reputation and image.
Netizens have split their views
As soon as this incident came out, netizens' opinions immediately split.
On the one hand, some people believe that employees, as media operators, should understand and abide by professional ethics and company regulations, especially the promotion of competing products on public platforms.
On the other hand, some netizens feel that employees' personal consumption behavior should be distinguished from work, and as long as it does not affect work performance, it should be personal freedom to buy products from other brands.
Reflection and discussion
Behind this controversy over a car is actually a reflection of the current society's discussion and reflection on the balance between corporate culture, employee rights, professional ethics and personal freedom.
For example, does it really violate professional ethics for an employee to promote a competing product on his personal social media account?
Should employees' personal consumption behavior be subject to the company's regulations?
Prospects for the future
As social media plays an increasingly important role in people's daily lives, how to achieve harmonious coexistence between employees and enterprises while safeguarding their respective legitimate rights and interests will be a long-term and complex issue.
Eventually, this incident may fade into oblivion with time, but the debate it has sparked about the balance between workplace rules and individual rights will undoubtedly continue to provoke deep thought.