A self-media self-labeled as "41 years old, Zhejiang University", and the social platform officially certified as "university chemistry professor, doctoral supervisor" "Professor Deuterium", has been publishing mostly extreme and violent remarks, which has aroused the attention and heated discussions of netizens, and recently, his inhumane and anti-human remarks about the "Russian-Ukrainian war" are even more controversial.
It turned out that on April 9, "Professor Deuterium" @ "Russian Embassy in China" said:
"A piece of advice to Russia, NATO prisoners of war, don't kill, cut off limbs, gouge out eyes, and give them back. Don't cut your tongue, so they will tell others about the horrors of the battlefield."
Some netizens commented: "Professor Deuterium's suggestion is good, but the operation is more troublesome."
"Professor Deuterium" replied: "Let the medical students do the amputation." Just practice your hands. ”
Regarding the objections, "Professor Deuterium" previously said: "There is a writer who has written an article criticizing me for being anti-human. This is not unusual, there are many traitors among the literati, so just block them directly...... Literati will not understand this truth, and double-standard traitors do not understand "Yunyun."
On April 18, the reporter interviewed the person in charge of the Department of Chemistry of Zhejiang University, but the person in charge of Zhejiang University said, "I have checked, and this person is not from the Department of Chemistry of Zhejiang University." When the reporter inquired on the 18th, it was found that the relevant social platforms had also banned the account of "Professor Deuterium".
It is not difficult to see from the past remarks of "Professor Deuterium" that although he marked the words "Zhejiang University," it now seems that he did not teach at Zhejiang University -- but it is difficult to rule out that he once studied or worked at Zhejiang University, right? Otherwise, shouldn't Zhejiang University investigate such "fraudsters" who have ruined his reputation? Zhejiang University, you shouldn't hold this person up high and put it down gently, right?
However, from the fact that he has published a lot of content about colleges and universities, as well as the official certification of "university professor and doctoral supervisor", it can still be inferred that "Professor Deuterium" is very likely to be a university professor, but Zhejiang University does not claim it, "whose child will claim it"?
It's just that the "deuterium professor" of the "chemistry professor", the deuterium gas you are very familiar with, is obviously not the deuterium gas —— a dignified university professor, who has made so many extreme remarks, which can't help but make people feel puzzling and worried:
Is our humanities education so a failure? What is even more terrifying is that such a person has occupied such an important platform and resource of colleges and universities, and under the influence of his ears and eyes, will the students he has educated be all "not deuterium but anger"? This is the most sorrowful and frightening part!
First, as for the "NATO prisoners of war" that "Professor Deuterium" proposed that Russia should brutally treat, is it considered a "prisoner of war" in international law? Or is it that "it is just a mercenary" as netizens think, and it is not protected by relevant international law, so they can inflict "beastly punishment" on them as they want?
Mercenaries do exist in the international arena -- for example, Russia itself has them, and they have also been involved in the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield and have become the most powerful part of the military; but because they are too big, they have even waved troops into the country under dissatisfaction, creating a sensational "mutiny"; however, their leaders also died in a "plane accident" not long after.
First of all, as the two warring parties, has the Ukrainian side claimed, or in fact did the "deuterium professor" suggest that Russia "cut off their limbs and gouge out their eyes" mercenary prisoners?
In this case, even if it is true as netizens said: "Mercenaries are not protected by the Geneva International Convention", but "Professor Deuterium" suggested that the Russian side should do those cruel "inhumane and anti-human" things, is this really good for Russia?
Perhaps this is an important reason why the Russian embassy did not reply to the flattery of "Professor Deuterium"?
So, for "prisoners of war", including the "NATO prisoners of war" as mentioned by "Professor Deuterium" - many netizens think that they are not "prisoners of war", but "mercenary prisoners of war", but in fact, after they become "prisoners" who have laid down their arms on the battlefield, as for what legal treatment applies, such as international law or domestic law, it is obvious that they must act "in accordance with the law", and it is by no means the ancient lawless torture and "bestial punishment" of "inhumane and anti-human" as "Professor Deuterium" said.
If any country, institution or individual in the international community dares to inflict such inhumane torture on those who have laid down their arms, as "Professor Deuterium" said, it will inevitably be criticized by public opinion all over the world and more likely to be prosecuted by relevant international law.
Because, after all, human society is constantly advancing in civilization, even for the bloody war murderer, the human society that has evolved to the current level of civilization is no longer like "Professor Deuterium", using the primitive animal nature of human beings to "counter violence with violence".
Because, the experience of human history tells us that countering violence with violence will only make the violence cycle indefinitely, and continue to escalate, and under such thinking and behavior, human society will only fall into the bottomless abyss, inflicting harm on each other and increasing the weight, and it will never end!
Second, one of the reasons and logic of many netizens supporting "Professor Deuterium" is: "War cannot and does not need to be humane."
On the surface, this remark seems to be very reasonable: in the face of a life-and-death war, how can humanity be used? When you talk about humanity, you are dying.
In particular, from the perspective of the just side of the anti-aggression war, people feel that they cannot talk about "humanity," which seems to sound like an unassailable viewpoint and logic.
However, "Professor Deuterium" is not talking about the two sides that are at war, and the "humanitarianism" I am talking about does not point to this - obviously, "Professor Deuterium" is talking about the question of how to deal with "NATO prisoners of war", that is, the object of our discussion is the question of how to treat "prisoners of war" who have laid down their arms.
For example, "Professor Deuterium" has repeatedly advocated that "literati criticizing his views are traitors with double standards", which also shows that the so-called professor's sophistry and ignorance are not unintentional, but only deliberately broken.
For example, since the founding of the Chinese revolutionary army, whether on the battlefield at home or abroad, the famous slogan of "surrender the gun and do not kill, give preferential treatment to prisoners" can be said to be known and known to everyone, and it has achieved good results -- it can not only make the enemy lay down his arms, but also influence him to become a new man, and even join the revolutionary ranks.
Even in the face of the extremely inhumane and anti-human Japanese invaders, the Chinese revolutionary army still adhered to the "revolutionary humanitarian spirit," which even influenced some Japanese to join the Chinese revolutionary ranks.
So, according to the logic and argument of "Professor Deuterium's" "double-standard traitor", isn't it a kind of smear and slander against "revolutionary humanitarianism"?
Third, when "Professor Deuterium" made this remark, he also specially @ the Russian Embassy, which obviously reflects his personal position of "where to sit in the ass" - this is not impossible for me, as an individual person, with independent views, on the contrary, our society is constantly pluralistic, tolerant, and relaxed, and is moving towards the realization of the core values of civilization such as "freedom and democracy".
However, there is a little "logical line" that cannot be understood by a real Chinese.
For example, according to the internal logic of "Professor Deuterium" who made such a special contribution to Russia, then, when examining the "Jiangdong 64tun Massacre" and the "Hailan Pao Massacre" in history, when looking at these aggressive colonial massacres that brutally killed thousands of people on the mainland, and the extremely inhumane and anti-human acts against civilians, I wonder if "Professor Deuterium" will still have the revenge of "cutting off limbs and gouging out his eyes" in the face of the "northern country" he offered?
In addition, recently, Russia once again held the so-called "Zhenbao Island War Commemoration" activity - then, if China carried out a righteous self-defense counterattack on Zhenbao Island, which defended the country, if our soldiers fell into the hands of the enemy and became prisoners of war, "Professor Deuterium", would you still give such a plan to the northerners?
If you still insist on your words and deeds, then ask "Professor Deuterium": Are you still a Chinese? Isn't it equivalent to an animal that "recognizes your father as a thief and betrays the country for glory"?
Fourth, under such extreme remarks as "Professor Deuterium", the account was finally blocked, and Zhejiang University also denied that "this is my person", but more evidence still shows that this gentleman is very likely to be a university teacher, or even his officially certified "university professor and doctoral supervisor", which is what is deeply worrying!
Why is it that the high position of our highest temple of knowledge, the university, is occupied by such "inhumane and anti-human" thinkers? Will the young people of the future be able to cultivate talents with truly civilized and humanistic qualities under their command?
On the contrary, for such a professor who has publicly made so many extreme remarks for a long time, I am afraid that it will be even more misleading, and even sow the seeds of danger and terror for society and the country, right?
Personal extreme remarks may be inevitable, but this happens to a person who is officially certified as a "university professor, doctoral supervisor", and it can still exist on the platform for a long time, and what is even more terrifying is that under his remarks, there are still many supporters, obviously, this is the most terrible phenomenon and reality!
This has to make people think deeply: "Professor Deuterium", in fact, "is not a person fighting", but there are a lot of similar words and deeds on the Internet, in our network environment and social soil, why will there be such a psychological distortion and distorted values?
Among them, an important point that has to be reflected on is the reality of the thinking of "hate education"!
We should reflect on history, especially in modern times, the suffering suffered by the Chinese nation under poverty and weakness, under colonial aggression and enslavement, which is innumerable and unforgettable -- of course, we must always remember the aphorism that "forgetting history is tantamount to betrayal", but we must not fall into the trap of "hateful education" of "countering violence with violence and redoubling the sacrifice".
"The Chinese people have stood up" and are growing stronger, but the purpose of our road to becoming a big country and a strong country is not the other way around, to return to the old path of "anti-human" crimes that others have taken - New China does not have any genes of aggression and enslavement of others, on the contrary, "long live the great unity of the people of the world" and "a community with a shared future for mankind" The spirit of New China is the great banner of New China standing among the nations of the world and planting it on the highest point of human morality, and it is also the source of morality and morality for us to truly not be bullied, but to win the dignity and respect of the whole world!
Therefore, those "inhumane and anti-human" extreme remarks should not have any soil for survival in New China, and they will only destroy the quality of Chinese civilization and the image of the country and the nation.
If it is an ordinary person, you may say that he is "stupid", but he constantly comes from the mouth of a university professor, then it can only be said that such a person is basically deliberately "bad".
This is because such people make such extreme remarks so unscrupulously, firstly, because they have a clear view of the social environment, and it is safer to say such seemingly "politically correct" remarks, and they think that they are standing on the so-called "moral high ground"; they can easily label their opponents as "double standards, traitors" at will.
Second, in the era of Internet self-media, such an unconventional "non-surprising and endless" is an excellent shortcut to fame and profit-grabbing traffic, brainwashing fans, harvesting "leeks", and earning a full pocket!
In fact, from "Professor Deuterium", people will be reminded of the famous German "devil professor" Haber during World War I and World War II - he is also a famous professor of chemistry, and a Jew, who presided over the German poison gas factory, invented and used poison gas warfare, and poisoned 1.3 million soldiers and innocent people to death during World War I. After the start of World War II, he was forced to go into exile under anti-Semitism.
But Haber's wife, Clara, was full of humanitarianism, she hated gas warfare very much, repeatedly persuaded her husband to no avail, extremely disappointed and self-reproachful, and deeply desperate in her indignation, she committed suicide in May 1915 and died in the dead - this couple's completely different world views and life choices can be seen that the coexistence of human evil and animal nature and conscience and human nature coexist, but which is higher and lower is self-evident!
And does this "deuterium professor" in China also want to become a "devil professor" like Haber, so he is spurned by thousands of people and left a stench for thousands of years?
It is not difficult for us to find that no matter how society evolves and develops, although human beings will become more and more civilized, the people in this world will still be "human nature and animal nature coexist", and there will still be different groups such as anti-human and anti-civilization people, and civilized people who pursue conscience and pursue human nature.
Then, how to expand the cognition of human civilization and group growth, on the contrary, better limit the recurrence of "bestiality" in human nature, so that the inhumane, anti-civilizational, and anti-human groups shrink even smaller and smaller, should obviously be a major issue for society, the country, and all mankind.
These may be the two ultimate issues that the two major human civilizations, "moral civilization" and "rule of law civilization", have to face!
But the most critical point is that such a major issue of human destiny cannot allow the extreme "inhumane and anti-human" people like "Professor Deuterium" to occupy resources and high positions, otherwise, the consequences will be unimaginable, and such evil consequences will eventually backfire, and it will definitely include ——the backlash of people like "Professor Deuterium", "When the avalanche occurs, no snowflake is innocent; at the same time, there is no snowflake that can be saved from being counterattacked" [Original Comment: Yu said that it is still off]