1. Squeeze some people who have entered some state units on the basis of connections to the narrowest space.
2.985 college jobs are not allocated, which is a deception of highly talented students. Students who are admitted to the 985,211 should be allocated by the country so that talents will not be lost abroad.
3. It is a pity that the country, the family, and even the students themselves have spent so much manpower and material resources to cultivate talents, and it is a pity that they have wasted.
I'd also like to share my opinion:
1. Good academic performance is only one aspect, after stepping into the society, success mainly depends on emotional intelligence rather than IQ, 985/211 for college graduates part-time jobs are.
2. The distribution of these packages will destroy the level playing field, it is true that they have passed the fairest college entrance examination to step into a prestigious university, but it does not mean that they will sit back and enjoy their success once and for all.
3. The most should be allocated to those who have made important contributions to the country, especially the children of martyrs, everyone has no opinion on this, if you are not satisfied, you try,
4. Let's take an extreme example, as we all know, a 985 college graduate, although the graduate student is no longer admitted because of the cat abuse incident, but such an undergraduate graduate should also be allocated?
5. Package assignment may lead to a lack of motivation for self-exploration and entrepreneurship among students, as they may not go all out to pursue their dreams and interests with the guarantee.
6. Society is diverse, and different people have different values and contributions. Just because a person is a 985 or 211 graduate, doesn't mean they deserve special treatment.
7. Package allocation may cause unreasonable distribution of talents, and some students in marginal disciplines or less popular majors may enter unsuitable positions because of package allocation.
8. In modern society, lifelong learning has become a trend. Graduates of 985 and 211 should also understand that their academic qualifications are just a stepping stone, and real success depends on their subsequent efforts and growth.
9. Package assignment may weaken students' employability competitiveness because they may not have experienced real workplace competition and challenges.
10. Students should be encouraged to make career choices based on their interests and abilities, not just because of a certain school's fame or package allocation policies.
11. Package assignment may result in a waste of resources, as some students who may not be suitable for a position are also assigned work, which may affect the efficiency and effectiveness of the unit as a whole.
12. We should respect everyone's career choices and development paths, and should not use uniform standards to measure the value of all people.
13. Package assignment may undermine students' entrepreneurial spirit because they may feel that they have a stable job in hand and there is no need to take risks and innovate.
14. In modern society, career choices should be the right of the individual and not determined by the allocation of packages by schools or the state.
15. Package assignment may lead to students not valuing their work because they may not have experienced the effort and sweat that went into getting it.
16. Students should be encouraged to make career choices based on their interests and abilities, not just because of a particular school's fame or package allocation policy.
17. Package distribution may affect social mobility as it may limit development opportunities for those who are not 985 or 211 graduates.
18. We should value the efforts and talents of individuals, not just their academic background.
19. Package assignment may lead to student dissatisfaction with the job because they may find that they are not a good fit or do not like the work they are assigned.
20. We should encourage students to make career choices based on their interests and abilities, not just because of a certain school's fame or package allocation policies.
21. Package assignments may affect students' personal growth and development as they may miss out on opportunities to learn and explore in other areas.
22. Students should be encouraged to develop diverse skills and knowledge rather than relying solely on their professional background.
23. Package distribution may lead to a weakening of students' sense of social responsibility as they may feel secure and not responsible for their own future.
24. Students should be encouraged to think independently and make career choices, not just because of a particular school's fame or package allocation policies.
25. Package allocation may affect the innovation and development of society as it may limit development opportunities for those who are not 985 or 211 graduates.
26. Students should be encouraged to develop their own personalities and strengths, rather than relying solely on their academic background.
27. Package assignment may lead to student dissatisfaction with the job because they may find that they are not a good fit or do not like the work they are assigned to.
28. Students should be encouraged to make career choices based on their interests and abilities, not just because of a certain school's fame or package allocation policies.
29. Package assignments may affect students' personal growth and development as they may miss out on opportunities to learn and explore in other areas.
30. Students should be encouraged to develop diverse skills and knowledge rather than relying solely on their professional background.
31. Package distribution may lead to a weakening of students' sense of responsibility to society, as they may feel secure and not responsible for their own future.
32. Students should be encouraged to think independently and make career choices, not just because of a particular school's fame or package allocation policies.
33. Package allocation may affect the innovation and development of society as it may limit the development opportunities for those who are not 985 or 211 graduates.
34. Students should be encouraged to develop their own personalities and strengths, rather than relying solely on their academic background.
35. Package assignment may lead to student dissatisfaction with the job because they may find that they are not a good fit or do not like the work they are assigned.
36. We should encourage students to make career choices based on their interests and abilities, not just because of a particular school's fame or package allocation policy.
37. Package assignments may affect students' personal growth and development as they may miss out on opportunities to learn and explore in other areas.
38. Students should be encouraged to develop diverse skills and knowledge rather than relying solely on their professional background.
39. Package assignment may lead to a weakening of students' sense of responsibility to society, as they may feel secure and not responsible for their own future.
40. Finally, we should encourage students to think independently and make career choices, not just because of a particular school's fame or package allocation policy. The diversity and individualized development of society requires us to respect the choices and efforts of each individual.