Parents are affectionate to look at their children, and it is their duty not to look at them, netizens, what do you think about this point of view?
There is a mother whose baby is sick, and in order to take care of the baby, the mother has asked for many vacations one after another. If you take another leave this time, you are likely to be fired from the company.
Bao's mother sat helplessly in the living room with her sick son in her arms, and asked her husband, who was about to leave for work: "Did you call your mother?" ”
The husband turned around: "I beat her and can't get over it, so I'll be expelled, what can I do if the child is sick?"
Bao's mother was about to burst into tears when she heard it: "You said that it was so difficult to let her watch the child for a few days, and it would be okay if she didn't show it, since the child was a child, did she spend a penny on the child?"
Husband: "Oh, don't you do this? Then the parents see this as affection, not as duty, besides, don't you still have me? If I work for a while, won't the child's medicine money be enough?"
Her husband's words made her mother feel deeply helpless and lost, so she had to hug the child tightly and sobbed silently.
This video was uploaded to the Internet and aroused the empathy of netizens. Having parents to help you is a flat road, not having parents to help you is a detour, if you can, who is willing to take a detour?
The mother in the video, if the mother-in-law can come to help watch the children, why is she so helpless? Why worry about the children and lose your job?
If the mother-in-law has nothing to do, she should come to help her daughter-in-law when she is about to lose her job to take care of the children.
If the daughter-in-law is dismissed for this reason, resulting in no income, then isn't the pressure on his son even greater? Even if he doesn't think about his daughter-in-law, he has to think about his son.
Loading...
The impact of this video on female netizens is particularly great, and netizens empathize with the mother in the video, and also condemn the remarks that it is the duty of the husband to help but not to help.
Beijing netizens: I am in such a state now, I am often entangled, and I am often healed by myself, I want to cry in the dead of night, and occasionally I cry when I don't think about anything.
I wonder who are those who say that it is their duty not to help? Shouldn't the family help each other? When the child is sick, the mother-in-law does not help, and it is her own son who suffers. When your mother-in-law is old and sick, she also needs to be taken care of by her son, and then your daughter-in-law will not care about you. It's still his son who works hard, a candle burns at both ends, and it's no wonder if he doesn't die early.
My family is like this, when the two children are born, they don't care and don't help a penny. Now that my child is in college, I will never forget what she said, who loves children and is stupid.
It's not that people want to be close to you, it's because your mother-in-law is old and needs to be taken care of, so she comes to rely on you.
Parents can help watch their children when they are able, and then the young people can go out to earn money, and when they need money when they are old, the children will have the ability to give back to them.
Hubei netizens said well, if the husband and mother-in-law think that watching the child is helping the daughter-in-law, then such a man and in-laws are pathetic.
What is the duty and what is the affection between relatives, and should it be so clearly divided? If the division is so clear when the help of the elderly is needed, then the old people will be able to distinguish it very clearly when they are old in the future.
It is true that the daughter-in-law does not have the obligation to support her parents-in-law in law, and that obligation belongs to the husband, just as the son-in-law has no obligation to support her father-in-law and mother-in-law, and that obligation is also the daughter's.
When a daughter-in-law takes care of the elderly, she is doing her filial piety for her husband, so those who want to divide their feelings and duties are cold and selfish in their bones.
Write at the end
The child's early childhood stage is a very special stage, and it is also a relatively short stage, and the need for external help is nothing more than three or five years, and the child's growth period needs to be watched without leaving his hands.
For young people who want to work hard for their careers, they are indeed lacking in skills, and if the elderly in the family have the ability and time, they should still help.
I myself am also a person from here, and in the years when I raised children, my mother-in-law followed me.
My husband and wife have been farmers for generations, and if we didn't have my parents-in-law to take care of the children, even if we could finally take root in the big city, it would be much harder than before.
The emotional contribution is mutual, and when the small family needs external assistance, if the mother-in-law has the ability but stands by and watches, then such a mother-in-law should be condemned. In the future, when you get old, you won't get the same reward, and that's also your own cause and effect.
#评论区表情包大赛#