Since the Xiaomi SU7 conference on March 28, Xiaomi's popularity has risen gradually, from the start of sales to the present, there are almost no bad reviews of this car on the market, but the more the heat is said, the more the car is measured, the more fragrant it is.
So such a "hot" car, when we buy it in front of the screen, it should be a happy life. But recently, a man named "Da Yao Tok" shared several videos on Weibo and Douyin about his ordeal. He said that after buying the Xiaomi SU7 founding model, he was forcibly fired from the company in just five days without any compensation.
On this matter, if you want to ask how to confirm that it is true, it depends on the good means of this big brother. When he was interviewed by the company's human resources department, he took covert recordings in an attempt to induce HR to admit that he had been fired because he had purchased a car from a rival company. The whole process from the appointment to the forced resignation took only an hour, and in the end it was as he wished: he was told that he had violated the company's non-compete rules.
Soon after the announcement of this incident, it rushed to the hot search, and netizens commented on the incident with labels such as "careful eyes", "jealousy", and "envy". That's not surprising. After all, Xiaomi has always been the focus of hot topics. It really doesn't make sense to say that he was fired just because he bought a car, after all, he bought a car autonomously, and he didn't use the company's money.
During this time, the incident has aroused widespread public attention, so the legal department of the car company where the employee worked before, Jiyue Automobile, today attacked hard and officially responded.
It confirms the speculation of some netizens, things are far from that simple. How can an employee of an automobile company decide to fire an employee just because he has bought a product from another car company? Isn't that a hat of "small pattern" on itself? Saving money: To summarize the following points stated by the legal department of Jiyue Company
1. The employee "Da Yao Tok" was not fired for buying Xiaomi SU7 products;
2. During the employee's tenure, he was in the product development department, responsible for working in social media/Civic operation positions, and used Jiyue's company account to call for the Xiaomi brand for a long time on multiple social platforms, and only released the content of Xiaomi-related models.
3. The employee has been absent from work many times without reason, especially on April 3, he was absent from work to attend the delivery ceremony of the first batch of owners of Xiaomi SU7, and claimed that "Lei Jun personally opened the door for me" as a propaganda point.
Knock on the blackboard, mark the key points! At present, the employee's behavior has seriously damaged the reputation of Jiyue. In this regard, the legal department of Jiyue has collected evidence and reserves the right to further pursue responsibility.
In response to this incident, netizens' comments were also varied, exploding. The first batch was to ask thought-provoking questions, what kind of company is this Jiyue? I had never heard of this before.
Then, the rest of the netizens said: Isn't this a marketing method?
Another wave of netizens had other thoughts about this, saying: In terms of marketing methods, Xiaomi says that no one says second. But it is also inseparable from the great help of the existence of the head!
While eating melons, some netizens made an objective voice after reviewing the whole incident.
Some people say that people who are in Cao Ying's heart and Han and eat in the bowl and look at the pot will also be rejected by their peers.
In this case, I would like to make a small piece of advice: do not act too far away from the spectrum. As Nietzsche said, "When you stare into the abyss, the abyss stares at you." As Shakespeare famously said in Hamlet, "To live or to perish, it's a question," and it's not just about life or death, it's about where your own choices lead you. Before making a decision, think carefully and consider the possible consequences of each choice, which will ultimately determine your fate to survive or to perish!
In the end, whether it is you who eat melons or you who are angry. How do you feel about this incident?