Megan greets sick employees and sends a basket of food, flowers, or gifts to those who are struggling, depressed, or sick. In addition to this, he bought pizza and cookies for his employees, held tea parties and ice cream social events. - Harry, "Spare Tire"
Harry's autobiographical work "Spare Tire" describes his wife Meghan as a generous, beautiful hostess and a gentle and compassionate leader.
During Meghan's stay at Kensington Palace, she would bring employees to tears from time to time. Samantha Cohen, a 54-year-old veteran employee of the palace for nearly 20 years, declined to give specifics in an interview, but was questioned, referring to a report by one of Harry and Meghan's communications assistants at the time: they had ousted two employees, one of whom was treated as completely unacceptable. Meghan bullied Y and repeatedly undermined her confidence, which many people have seen.
Royal writer Valindina also said: Cohen and Meghan don't get along well, although Cohen was the late queen's right-hand man back then, an old man in the palace, and used to get along well with the queen.
Later, at the Queen's request, she worked alongside Meghan and Harry and was instrumental in helping Meghan prepare to attend the Buckingham Palace garden party for the first time as the Duchess of Sussex. But Meghan is not grateful, and the two do not get along well.
During Cohen's first official visit to Australia when he accompanied Harry and Meghan, Meghan often yelled at her. Cohen was telling the people around him that working for Harry and Meghan was like working for a few teenagers, and that Meghan and Harry never spoke well, and it was too painful to push her to the limit of patience.
Look at Cohen's statement, working for Harry and Meghan is like working for two teenagers, tsk, that kind of statement is fresh.
The narrative for Meghan, Harry and the media, as well as the staff, is completely different. In response, Harry and Meghan made a strong statement: It is all slander, and we have seen a certain media endorse this slanderous description.
To sum up, in the mouths of other royal employees, Meghan is a hysterical "crazy woman" image who does not control her emotions well and often collapses, she does not do royal work well, cannot complete the tasks assigned by the royal family well, and often transfers this emotion to others. In figurative terms, anger often affects the innocent.
Of course, it is also possible that Megan was essentially a man of perfection.
I looked on the Internet and found that Meghan, who was born on August 4, 1981, belongs to Leo, and the most prominent characteristics of Leos are: they like to be the center of attention, to be the most visible one in the crowd, they like power and status, and they are also very conscious of their image and taste. Whether in the workplace or at home, Leos strive to be leaders and decision-makers.
Meghan's actions are indeed in line with Leo's personality traits, however, in fact, her personality is similar to Virgo, if her birthday is pushed back a little, she may be a Virgo, and the most prominent characteristic of Virgo is to strive for perfection and strive for perfection in everything. If you can't do it, it's easy to have an emotional breakdown. The problem is that they are not only themselves, but also on others, and as a result, they are strained in relationships.
Meghan instigated Harry to leave the royal family, Meghan is in a dominant position in her family life with Harry, and even Meghan took a photo after giving Harry the award two days ago, driving away female fans and not allowing her to stay by Harry's side.
The fact is that people with a strong desire to control are in an environment that they are unfamiliar with, and they feel that nothing can be done, they are prone to emotional breakdowns, and they will lose their temper.
So the question is, why can such Meghan hold on to Harry tightly and make him love passionately and focused.
The so-called bell must be tied to the bell person, and Meghan's obviously flawed personality traits fall into Harry's eyes, but instead they become a projection of cuteness and true temperament. True answer to that sentence: my arsenic, your honey.
Harry has lived in the deep palace of the Qing rules and regulations since he was a child, and he is not allowed to do this, nor can he do that, in addition, the royal family also stipulates that he cannot cry, do not explain, and do not make it public, for these laws, he has been holding his stomach since he was a child, so he has many rebellious behaviors when he grows up, such as smoking marijuana for curiosity, attending banquets naked, wearing Nazi uniforms to masquerade balls, etc. Of course, these actions were condemned by the population without exception.
Since he met Meghan, he has discovered that there can be another way of life in the world: when he is happy, he can grin and laugh, and when he is angry, he can raise his eyebrows and scold, and express his dissatisfaction.
That's exactly what Meghan did during their trip with Cohen. All this behavior is very cute in Harry's eyes. He vowed to be good to this woman for the rest of his life, to protect her true nature, and to let her be free to be herself.
You see, there are many kinds of couples in the world, there are homogeneous types, and there are complementary types, in fact, each of them can be happy.
It's still the same sentence, your arsenic, my honey, Meghan in the face of bad mood, Harrigan is like a glutton.
Go your own way and let others say go.