**Pension merger this year, public institutions will bid farewell to high pensions? The truth is cruel**
This year's news of pension merger has attracted widespread attention from the society. Many people believe that this marks that public institutions will bid farewell to the situation of high pensions. But is this really the case? This article will delve into the truth behind this policy.
First, let's briefly review the background of the pension merger. In the past, the mainland practiced a dual-track pension system, that is, the pension system for employees of enterprises and employees of public institutions was different. The pensions of the employees of enterprises are mainly paid by individuals and enterprises, while the pensions of the employees of public institutions are mainly borne by the state finance. This dual system has led to a large treatment gap between the two. In order to achieve social equity, the state decided to implement the reform of pension integration.
So, does the merger of pensions mean that public institutions will bid farewell to high pensions? In fact, the answer to this question is not simple. On the one hand, the reform of pension integration does help narrow the gap between enterprises and institutions. After the reform, the pensions of employees of public institutions will also be jointly paid by individuals and enterprises, which means that the pensions of employees of public institutions will no longer be completely dependent on state finance. This undoubtedly contributes to the achievement of social equity.
However, on the other hand, we cannot ignore that even with the reform of pension consolidation, the pension of employees of public institutions is still relatively high. This is mainly due to the fact that the wages of the staff and staff of public institutions are generally relatively high, and they often enjoy relatively complete social security during their employment. In addition, employees of public institutions in some special industries, such as universities and hospitals, may enjoy additional benefits.
Therefore, we can conclude that although the reform of pension integration can help narrow the treatment gap between enterprises and institutions, it cannot completely eliminate this gap. The pension of employees of public institutions is still relatively high, but this advantage is gradually weakening. This reform will not only help to achieve social equity, but also help to improve the level of old-age security in society as a whole.
In order to better cope with this reform, employees of public institutions need to pay more attention to the accumulation and investment of personal pensions. They can be fully prepared for retirement through sound financial planning. At the same time, the state should also strengthen supervision to ensure the smooth implementation of the pension reform to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the majority of retired workers.
In short, although the reform of pension integration cannot completely eliminate the treatment gap between enterprises and institutions, it is an important step towards achieving social equity. We should face this reform with a positive attitude, strive to improve our pension security level, and jointly build a fairer and more harmonious society.
Finally, we hope that the government will continue to pay attention to the pension issue and formulate more perfect policies and measures to ensure that every retired employee can enjoy reasonable pension security. At the same time, we also call on the whole society to work together to pay attention to the living conditions of the elderly and provide them with more care and support. Only in this way can we truly realize the social vision of "the elderly have something to rely on and care for".