Was it intentional injury or justifiable self-defense?
It may seem that it is only the definition of punishment that is different, but the actual impact may be a child's future!
A few days ago, the incident of "being detained for a conflict with a drunk" in Jinan has attracted widespread attention from all walks of life. At present, the case has been escalated, the boy's release on bail pending trial has been completed, and his family said that the child has returned home.
When interviewed by reporters, some details revealed by the boy's father once again aroused the attention and discussion of many netizens.
It is reported that the boy Xiaochao is a vocational school student. On the night of the incident, he saw a girl being molested and harassed by three drunk men outside the school while waiting for takeaway, so he took the initiative to help.
As a result, he angered the drunk and was chased into the campus and beaten. In the process, Xiao Chao was choked by the neck by the drunk and fought back when he felt suffocated. This caused the drunk to fall to the ground and suffered a trauma to the head. Subsequently, he was diagnosed with brain herniation and underwent a craniotomy.
Originally, that night, Xiaochao had signed a settlement agreement with the drunk man under the mediation of the police. didn't want to think that the next day, the situation changed abruptly, and Xiao Chao was detained on suspicion of intentional injury, and it has been more than half a month.
The reason why this incident has aroused so much concern in the society is mainly because the police punishment is not enough to convince the public. Whether it is the "mutual assault" that initially signed the settlement agreement, or the crime of criminal detention later, "intentional injury".
At least judging from the current information disclosed by the media and insiders, this matter seems to be a definite and legitimate defense.
It was Xiao Chao who faced the drunken man and flirted with him, first stood up and acted bravely, and then in the process of being beaten, he had to fight back.
And in the end, it seems that because the drunk man was diagnosed with brain herniation, all the fault became Xiaochao's. Neither in terms of reason nor law is enough to convince the public.
However, the good news at present is that the case has been taken seriously by the public security system and has been promoted to a higher level. At the same time, a special case group was set up, and the procuratorial system was invited to supervise the handling.
On the 14th, Xiaochao's father also received a notice that he could handle bail pending trial for his son. The process was not completed that day, and on the evening of the 15th, Xiaochao returned home after completing the formalities for release on bail pending trial, and his family revealed that he was in good physical and mental condition.
Xiaochao's father was interviewed by reporters and said that he had repeatedly checked a piece of surveillance at the scene. It was indeed the drunk who grabbed his son's neck before the son fought back.
However, the little superman is tall and big, with a height of 1.81 meters and a weight of 200 pounds. The other party is far less strong than him in terms of figure.
Xiaochao's father also said that after learning about the incident, he hoped to contact the beaten man through the police as soon as possible, hoping to reach a settlement by paying medical expenses. But the other party never agreed, and he didn't want to see him.
The point of view says:
For a father, it is understandable to reach a settlement by paying money and other means to get his son out of detention.
However, in this case, especially after a reasonable determination of "justifiable self-defense" is involved, "reconciliation" is by no means the best approach.
Back to this case, the main point of public dissatisfaction at present is that Xiaochao fought back when his throat was locked, that is, his life and safety were threatened, why is it not justified defense?
And, who are the provocateurs, who are the unreasonable first? How can those who act bravely become sinners?
At present, it can be concluded that the drunk man molested the girl first, but before the drunk man rushed into the school, did Xiao Chao have verbal provocation? It is not certain about this, but this point is very crucial and can directly affect the final characterization of the case.
There is also Xiaochao's motive for self-preservation, but in addition to self-preservation, after the other party falls to the ground, does he continue to move? This is also very important.
As for the drunkard's brain herniation, is it directly related to Xiao Chao's counterattack? All of this needs to be answered by a truth.
The last thing we want to see is that because this case has chilled the hearts of the people, no one has dared to act bravely, and they have fallen into the vicious circle of "whoever is injured is justified".
However, there are still many doubts about this case. Now that it has been upgraded, let's wait for the official announcement and wait and see what happens.
We believe that the law will eventually restore the innocence of the innocent and will eventually bring justice into reality! We are all the more convinced that the law will never bow to lawlessness!