The car is fighting until now, and it is intelligent technology that is spelling, so there are fewer and fewer physical buttons now, replaced by a large screen or a screen, or even a triple screen, without physical buttons, add a few large screens, and the entire interior looks more advanced. But do you support the abolition of physical buttons?
I've really researched this. The most irresponsible, even regressive thing that car companies have done is to put a large screen on the central control and cancel the physical buttons. I really don't understand what these car companies think, I put up with you putting the temperature of the air conditioner on the central control screen. Put the volume adjustment on the large central control screen, and I put up with it, after all, there is a multi-function steering wheel to operate.
But how can you put the gear shift on the central control screen? You can also have a good screen interaction design, and some cars can be stabilized by adding and minus signs, so small buttons, I can see it if I don't turn my head? At best, they are designed to be integrated, and the central control is more concise. But it affects driving safety too much, and I have to turn the screen in order to adjust the temperature when driving a car, so doesn't this increase the risk factor?
Someone said, isn't there voice control? I'll just say that, voice control will inevitably encounter "intellectual retardation", and then what design is not designed, they are in order to save costs and increase profits, in case of breakage, directly for you to change the central control, you say that changing a button compared with changing a central control, which profit is high?