Recently, on social media, there was a "contradictory incident" between a Mercedes-Benz car and Aunt Garlic Miao that sparked heated discussions among netizens, in which a Mercedes-Benz accidentally crushed a piece of garlic seedling land during driving, and the owner of Garlic Seedling Land - an aunt, in order to express her dissatisfaction, directly picked up a stone and smashed the Mercedes-Benz, resulting in serious damage to the vehicle.
In this regard, the owner of the Mercedes-Benz called the police on the spot, and the aunt was also taken away by the police for investigation for deliberately destroying other people's property.
Such an emergency is indeed easy to attract widespread attention, but after seeing the whole process of the incident, do you think the Mercedes-Benz owner should be fully responsible for the accident?
Or do you think that Auntie's extreme behavior is already a complete excesse?
So, in this contradictory incident, who should be more responsible for this accident, and how to reasonably resolve the contradictions between them?
Perhaps, through an in-depth discussion, we can have a more comprehensive understanding of this incident.
1. Event review:
In fact, in this sudden contradictory incident, the most incomprehensible thing is probably the behavior of the aunt directly smashing the car with a stone, after all, in our daily life, we rarely encounter such a thing, so it will cause so much discussion and attention.
However, if you carefully understand the process of the whole incident, you will find that the reason why Aunt Garlic Miao made such an extreme behavior actually has a lot to do with the entire accident process.
It turned out that at the scene of the accident at that time, the aunt was not just a one-time stone smashing the car, but only did such a thing after many fruitless negotiations, so her behavior was actually in a "very ignorant state", and she was not deliberately finding fault.
However, in any case, this expression of the aunt is indeed a bit extreme, after all, it is not possible to solve the problem by destroying other people's property.
In the course of the whole incident, the Mercedes-Benz owner also said that he was in a "very confused" state at that time, and he didn't know what happened to him at all, so he had a certain fear of his aunt's emotions.
In fact, in such a "porcelain" incident, many times, the emotions of the parties will be affected to a certain extent, resulting in their inability to make correct judgments, which is why we should maintain a "normal heart" in our daily life, and learn to analyze calmly when encountering problems, rather than being swayed by momentary impulses.
However, after understanding the whole incident, what do you think of Auntie's behavior?
Or perhaps, after she did such a thing, should the Mercedes owner already take full responsibility for the entire accident?
II. Incident Analysis:
In this contradictory incident, this extreme behavior of the aunt undoubtedly brought certain economic losses to the Mercedes-Benz owner, so as a party, the Mercedes-Benz owner certainly has the right to ask the other party for corresponding compensation.
However, in the whole incident, we can not ignore the behavior of the Mercedes-Benz owner, after all, after the accident, she did not understand the whole picture of the accident for the first time, but chose to "escape" the scene, which invisibly aggravated the other party's emotional impulse, leading to the further development of the incident.
In fact, in a "porcelain" incident like this, the emotions of the parties will indeed have a certain impact on the resolution of the entire incident, and if there is a problem in the communication between the parties, it is easy to lead to further intensification of the conflict.
After the Mercedes-Benz owner chose to "escape" the scene, such behavior invisibly gave the other party the illusion of "evading responsibility", so there were various disputes and contradictions later.
In addition, in the course of the whole incident, we should also have a clear understanding of whether there is a problem of "illegal driving" in Mercedes-Benz.
After all, if she strayed into the "forbidden road section", then she had already violated the corresponding traffic regulations, and such a violation would also have a certain impact on the normal life and production of others, so it is also possible that she was the first to cause the damage to the garlic seedlings later.
In fact, in such an incident, it is not easy to achieve the effect of reconciliation, and all parties need to be able to maintain sufficient understanding and tolerance, as well as a calm and objective attitude.
Only in this way can we find a solution that is "satisfactory to both parties", and in the whole incident, the intervention of the police and judicial organs is required, and it is even more necessary for the relevant departments to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the accident process to restore the truth of the accident and find the responsibility.