Zhang Pei reported on the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission that the attitude was perfunctory, avoiding the important and trivial, and covering up the facts...... Recently, the relevant punishment circular pointed out that Wu Jianfa, former member of the leading party group and vice chairman of the Fuzhou CPPCC in Jiangxi Province, did not truthfully explain the problem when organizing the inquiry; He Jian, former secretary of the leading party group and director of the Sichuan Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, violated the organizational principles and did not truthfully explain the problem when organizing talks and inquiries; and Cao Longshan, former deputy secretary of the Huaibei City CPC Committee in Anhui Province, did not know how to be in awe and did not truthfully explain the problems when organizing the talks and inquiries. Previously, Han Xianghui, former secretary of the party committee and director of the Qinghai Provincial Emergency Management Department, and Chen Jiangbo, former member of the party group and deputy procurator general of the Hubei Provincial People's Procuratorate, were also notified of similar problems.
The purpose of the conversation and correspondence is to let the party members and cadres who are interviewed and questioned clarify the problem in an attitude of loyalty and honesty to the party, which is conducive to the organization to conduct accurate research and judgment, and timely and effectively grasp the symptoms and tendencies of the problem, and prevent the problem before it happens. However, some party members and cadres had a perfunctory attitude when they were interviewed by the organization, did not truthfully explain the problem, and were finally dealt with seriously.
In the face of interviews and inquiries, some party members and cadres deliberately concealed the facts and even provided false information
On October 16, 2023, the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Luoyang City, Henan Province, filed a case for review and investigation against Cai, a third-level investigator in the city. After investigation, Cai took out a loan of 1.2 million yuan from the bank in the name of buying a house, and actually used the loan for illegal profit-making activities. Previously, when he was questioned by the organization, he avoided the important and did not truthfully explain the situation to the organization, in an attempt to get away with it. Later, after filing a case for examination and investigation, it was not only verified that the above-mentioned problems were found, but also that they violated the spirit of the eight central regulations. In the end, Cai's disciplinary gains were all confiscated and will face serious treatment.
"Conversation and correspondence are not ordinary heart-to-heart conversations, they are the trust and care of the organization, and they are also warnings and reminders of discipline. Zhao Liang, director of the Third Supervision and Inspection Office of the Luoyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, who handled the case, analyzed that some party members and cadres who violated discipline and law failed to truly believe in the organization and rely on the organization, and had a fluke mentality, which eventually caused irreparable consequences.
Combing through relevant cases found that party members and cadres did not truthfully explain the problem when they were interviewed by the organization. Some of the explanatory materials provided were incomplete or of low quality, and they did not reply to the questions raised in the conversation or letter; some had a perfunctory attitude and simply replied to the people and things involved in the conversation and inquiry as "not existing" or "did not know," or did not reply in detail on the grounds that they had not been impressed by the long time; some had the mentality of taking chances, avoiding the important and trivializing, and trying to say small problems and let go of the big ones; and even worse, they deliberately concealed them by carefully designing "scripts" and "scripts," colluding with relevant parties, and passing on relevant problems to relatives, friends, and specific related persons.
"Party members and cadres do not truthfully explain the problems when they are interviewed by the organization, and there are mainly the following two situations: one is that there is no problem of violation of discipline and law, and out of insufficient understanding of the seriousness of the conversation and inquiry, or out of negligence and negligence, they give an incomplete or wrong reply; the other is that they themselves have problems of violating discipline and law, and out of the psychology of coping, luck, fear, confrontation, etc., they deliberately conceal the facts and even provide false information in order to evade accountability. Zhang Xinyun, a cadre of the First Discipline Inspection and Supervision Office of the Siming District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Xiamen City, Fujian Province, told reporters.
"Party members and cadres respond perfunctorily or deliberately deceive in conversations and inquiries, which will not only mislead the direction of work and waste resources, but also miss the opportunity to be saved by education. Zhang Xinyun said.
The new provisions of the Disciplinary Regulations demonstrate a clear attitude of strict discipline with higher standards, stricter requirements and tougher measures
Disloyal and dishonest to the organization, it is inevitable to be dealt with seriously. Article 81, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the newly revised "Regulations on Disciplinary Sanctions of the Communist Party of China" (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulations") stipulates that "when organizing conversations and inquiries, those who do not truthfully explain problems to the organization" and "the circumstances are more serious" shall be given a warning or serious warning;
"There are similarities between 'not truthfully explaining the problem during the interview' and 'providing false information to the organization and covering up the facts', but there are differences between the two in terms of the subjective purpose of the conduct and the nature and type of the disciplinary violation. Zhou Pengfei, director of the case trial room of the Luoyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, introduced.
Separate and clear provisions are made for different degrees of relevant disciplinary violations, and in practice attention should be paid to accurate understanding and characterization. "If there is no intention to confront the enemy, but only a negative or false defense is made based on the fear of punishment and other intentions, and the issues involved in the organization of conversations and inquiries are general or relatively general, and do not involve serious violations of discipline and law, it is a violation of organizational discipline, and they shall be pursued for party discipline responsibility in accordance with article 81 of the "Regulations". Chen Guoshu, deputy director of the case trial room of the Xiamen Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, said that if the person being interviewed and questioned subjectively intentionally provided false information to the organization, interfering with or obstructing the discipline inspection and supervision organs in handling the case, it constitutes confrontation with the organization's review and violation of political discipline, and he should be investigated for party discipline responsibility in accordance with Article 63 of the "Regulations".
Liu Gaobo, director of the case trial room of the Yueyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision of Hunan Province, analyzed that the continuous revision and improvement of the relevant content of the "Regulations" demonstrates a clear attitude of strict discipline with higher standards, stricter requirements and harder measures.
At the same time, the "Regulations" pay attention to education and guidance, adhere to the balance of leniency and severity, and precise disposal. Article 17 of the "Regulations" adds that "in the process of organizing conversations and inquiries", being able to cooperate with the verification and review work and truthfully explain the facts of one's violation of discipline and law is a circumstance where "the punishment may be mitigated or commuted".
This shows that our party's principle of punishing the former and punishing the latter and treating the sick and saving the people runs through the entire process of supervising discipline enforcement and law enforcement. Du Daoquan, director of the case trial room of the Henan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, told reporters that it is necessary to comprehensively consider factors such as the time of cooperation of the person being interviewed and questioned, the quality of the cooperation attitude, the nature of the disciplinary violation and the harmful results, and accurately use the mitigating and mitigating circumstances, and encourage the party members and cadres who are being interviewed and questioned to fully believe in the organization, rely on the organization, and truthfully explain the problem clearly.
Make good use of conversations and inquiries, and earnestly improve the quality of conversations and inquiries
Conversations and inquiries are serious intra-party supervision work, and it is necessary not only to dare to use them in a common way, to grasp the small problems as early as possible, to prevent the slightest problems, and to maximize the function of treating diseases and saving people, but also to use them accurately and well, so as to effectively improve the quality of conversations and inquiries.
Persist in earnestly studying and judging based on the actual situation of the person being reflected. If the problem is of a general nature, an interview is usually conducted. Methods such as searching for public information, reading relevant materials, and learning about the situation from the real-name informant, the relevant discipline inspection and supervision organs, or the unit to which the person being reported belongs, may be used to learn about the personal circumstances of the subject of the proposed conversation or inquiry. "We should peel back the relevant information, carefully study and judge the problems reflected, and formulate a plan accurately. Xiamen Xiang'an District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision stationed in the first discipline inspection and supervision team leader Chen Fujiu said.
Conduct spot checks and verifications of the explanations of the respondents' interviews and inquiries. Conversations and inquiries cannot be "discussed in one go" or "written in one letter", and it is very important to do in-depth and detailed review work to improve the quality of conversations and inquiries. "After the interview, the information and information provided by the parties must not be relied on alone, and if necessary, the interview and correspondence can be reviewed. Yang Yazhong, director of the Case Supervision and Management Office of the Yueyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, pointed out that the review work can verify the parties' conversations and inquiries, so as to more accurately and effectively judge the authenticity of the conversations and inquiries.
Implement follow-up treatment and strive to improve the comprehensive effect. Zhao Liang said that it is necessary to put forward opinions on disposal in a timely manner, and if the feedback is untrue or there is no evidence to prove the existence of problems, it will be accepted and closed, and at the same time, it is necessary to do a good job of "prescribed actions" such as explaining the situation at the democratic life meeting (organizational life meeting) of the party organization where the subject of the conversation and inquiry is located, so as to clarify the names of party members and cadres; Where it is necessary to pursue discipline and law responsibility for crimes abusing public office, a preliminary review recommendation shall be submitted. At the same time, it is necessary to promptly give feedback on the handling situation to the real-name informant, and listen to the informant's opinions and suggestions. Zhao Liang said.
The conversation and correspondence fully reflect the care and trust of the party organization for party members and cadres, but care is not doting, and trust cannot be laissez-faire. Party members and cadres should draw lessons from the reported cases, further improve their ideological understanding, truthfully answer and explain when accepting organizational conversations and inquiries, take the initiative to admit and seriously rectify problems, and treat them correctly if there are no problems in the attitude of "if there is a change, if there is none, then encouragement", and truly take precautions and stop doing things.
Source: The website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission
Release: Publicity and Education Department of the Political and Legal Committee of the Gansu Provincial Party Committee