Zhu purchased police equipment, exercise coupons and other items
Impersonating a bailiff of the Court Enforcement Directorate
Use pre-purchased practice coupons to pass off as execution money
Let the applicant for enforcement believe that the execution money has been paid
Trick them into signing the receipt
……
In order to evade the court's enforcement, he directed and acted as a court bailiff to trick the applicant for enforcement into signing the relevant agreement, resulting in the failure to actually perform the debts of the effective judgment. Recently, after the Hanjiang District Procuratorate of Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province initiated a public prosecution, the court sentenced the defendant Zhu to seven years in prison and a fine of 150,000 yuan for fraud.
Impersonating a bailiff was recognized
In April 2023, a man wearing a police uniform, a hat and a mask knocked on Ms. Wu's door and said to Ms. Wu, "I am a bailiff of the court enforcement bureau, and the court previously ruled that Zhu should return more than 230,000 yuan to you, and it has been implemented in place, and I will make a special trip to you today." Only then did Ms. Wu notice that the man was still carrying a heavy blue cloth bag in his hand.
It turned out that Ms. Wu ran a toy company and went to court because of an economic dispute with Zhu, who also ran a toy company. In February 2023, the court ordered Zhu to return the money to Ms. Wu within the specified time limit, but Zhu failed to fulfill the repayment obligation, so Ms. Wu applied to the court for enforcement.
Ms. Wu let the man into the house, signed and stamped the relevant documents brought by the man, and took a photo with the man's ID card in hand as requested by the man, which was kept as file materials. After all the procedures were completed, the man was ready to leave, but when he left, he picked up the blue cloth bag on the table, said that the money still needed to be verified, and asked Ms. Wu to go to the court to retrieve it the next day.
As soon as she heard this, Ms. Wu immediately became suspicious and snatched the documents and materials she had just signed. The man was obviously panicked, and while the two were pulling each other, the man's hat and mask fell off, and Ms. Wu realized that the man who claimed to be a bailiff was actually the debtor Zhu.
Ms. Wu was shocked and frightened, because of the disparity in strength, the documents were finally snatched away by Zhu, and the ID card on the table was also taken away by Zhu. When Zhu left, Ms. Wu looked at the blue cloth bag pressed under her and found that it contained bundles of exercise coupons, and there was a genuine coin on the upper and lower sides of each bundle of exercise tickets. The frightened Ms. Wu immediately called the police for help, and at the same time handed over a mobile phone dropped by Zhu to the police. While the police were searching for Zhu's whereabouts, Zhu walked into the police station by himself. But he didn't come to surrender, but to report the case, "My mobile phone was detained by Ms. Wu!"
It wasn't the first time he'd done that
Ms. Wu and Zhu insisted on their own words, which surprised the police at the scene. After investigation, Zhu's mobile phone contained records of online shopping for police supplies and practice coupons, as well as photos taken by Ms. Wu holding her ID card, but Zhu claimed not to know about these evidence.
As the investigation deepened, the public security organs found that this was not the first time that Zhu had pretended to be a bailiff to send "execution money" to the person applying for execution. In December 2022, Mr. Liu and Mr. Zhu in Changzhou had an economic dispute, and Mr. Liu's claim was supported by the court's judgment, but Mr. Zhu failed to pay Mr. Liu more than 370,000 yuan in arrears within the specified time limit, and Mr. Liu applied to the court for compulsory enforcement.
A few days later, Mr. Liu received a phone call from a person claiming to be a court worker, and after confirming Mr. Liu's address, the other party said that the execution money had been fully executed and that he needed to hand over the cash to Mr. Liu in person. Although Mr. Liu was puzzled, he didn't care too much. The two agreed on the phone to meet at a time and place. Later, a man in a police uniform came to Mr. Liu's community with a bag of cash to meet him. The man followed the process and asked Mr. Liu to sign some documents and asked Mr. Liu to provide the company's seal and the company's business license. However, Mr. Liu said that he did not bring these materials with him and needed to go back to the company to pick them up. The man said, "Then you will take these things to the court tomorrow, and give you the money at the court when the time comes." ”
The next day, Mr. Liu brought the relevant documents and materials to the local court, but was told that no relevant court staff had come to his door to look for him, and the process of receiving the enforcement money obviously did not comply with the relevant regulations. Mr. Liu knew that he had been deceived, but because he had not suffered actual losses, he had no choice but to give up.
In February 2023, Mr. Liu received a call from the court, saying that he had received some materials provided by the person subject to enforcement, Mr. Zhu, including receipts and cash flow, to prove that Mr. Zhu had fulfilled his repayment obligations to Mr. Liu by paying in cash. However, there are doubts about this evidence and need to be confirmed by Mr. Liu. After Mr. Liu went to the court to verify, he found that the man who came to the door to pretend to be a bailiff asked him to sign these materials. The court then transferred the lead to the public security organs for further investigation.
He was clever and ended up in court
After arriving at the case, Zhu refused to admit that he pretended to be a bailiff to defraud the applicant for execution. After completing the collection of relevant evidence, in July 2023, the public security organs transferred the case to the Hanjiang District Procuratorate for review and prosecution.
After review, the procurator in charge found that Zhu purchased police equipment, exercise coupons and other items, pretended to be a bailiff of the court enforcement bureau, and used the practice coupons purchased in advance to pass off the execution money, so that Mr. Liu believed that the execution money was in place, and deceived Mr. Liu into signing the receipt, resulting in the court's inability to actually enforce the debts of the effective judgment of Zhu and Mr. Liu. Later, the old trick was repeated, deceiving Ms. Wu into signing the forged enforcement legal documents, but Ms. Wu was found out on the spot and failed. The procuratorate believes that Zhu X fabricated facts, concealed the truth, and defrauded others of property for the purpose of illegal possession, and the amount was particularly huge, and his conduct was suspected of the crime of fraud, and he had already begun to commit the crime, and he failed to succeed for reasons other than his will, which was an attempt to commit a crime. In August 2023, the Hanjiang District Procuratorate prosecuted the case. A few days ago, after a court hearing, the court adopted the facts of the crime charged by the procuratorate and the sentencing recommendation put forward by the procuratorate, and made the above judgment.
Knock on the blackboard
In this case, Zhu acted clever and directed a trick of pretending to be a court staff to deliver "execution money", and was finally sentenced to actual punishment for fraud, and the gains outweighed the losses. In this process, Zhu always refused to admit his guilt, and he hoped to cover up the facts of his crime through various denials, but as long as he violated the red line of the law, the evidence would restore all the facts and truth. The procurator hereby reminds the general public that the personnel of the state judicial organs will abide by strict regulations when handling cases, and that once it is discovered that a suspicious person has engaged in the act of impersonating a staff member of the state judicial organ, he must promptly report it to the public security organs, so as to avoid property losses.
#我要上头条##我要上 Headlines##司法警察##执行款#
Source: Procuratorate Daily, Rule of Law News Edition