Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also brings you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
With the development of the times, in fact, many young people have changed their work ideas, and the popular "let the post-00s bring changes to the workplace" that is now prevalent on the Internet is also issued in the context of such an era, but in fact, the direction of choosing a job is still relatively fixed.
We see that many people choose flexible employment, do not need to adjust their schedule, do not need to worry about lateness or company oppression, complex workplace relationships and other problems, which makes many people envious of flexible employment.
As a result, people who have long been in the workforce have also begun to think about whether they can choose flexible employment and live a more free life like young people today, in fact, this possibility is possible, but it is more risky.
We must understand that as a group that has been working in society for several years, where is the framework of our own experience, and the direction of our employment should consider professionalism, and we cannot say that we can arbitrarily decide our own direction.
If you want to go out and work alone, you don't have something to get your hands on, the biggest possibility is failure, as an ordinary member of society, in fact, we should understand the difficulty of starting from scratch, in the case of this cognition, it is difficult to work flexibly.
Of course, if you have a vocational skill that has reached the level of proficiency, you lack a little courage, and you may have a better way out if you choose flexible employment, but this is only a small number of cases.
Let's think about it, in the era when technology is the primary focus, if you have excellent personal ability, how likely is it that you will be hidden by the company? Therefore, people who have more than ordinary people's abilities have long gone up, and most people can only accept their ordinariness.
As an ordinary person, we have certain technical means in our respective fields, but to say that with the current level of going it alone, the risks outweigh the benefits, we don't have such a high talent, we have to rely on experience and hard work to make up for it.
It is wise to wait until you really have the relevant technology and then choose your own path, rather than seeing that others have chosen flexible employment and have a very chic life, and you have to blindly follow the herd.
We still advise everyone not to choose flexible employment, especially for those who have been in the society for several years, now is the rising period of their careers, because it is not worth it to choose to leave the workplace and start over on impulse.
It's not just about your personal courage, it's also about cost-effectiveness, whether the degree of freedom in flexible employment is comparable to what you've accumulated over the years?
According to the situation of most people, the ultimate result of choosing the direction of flexible employment is that all efforts are in vain, because there is no corresponding investment philosophy and technical level, so this choice is very disadvantageous, after all, most industries have decades of accumulation.
Although I have been in the post for several years, I am still a newcomer to the entire industry, so why should I win against those old industries? Obviously, it is a very high-risk option, and many people will say that the benefits are proportional to the risks, but the risks are too great.
Comparing the current examples, what percentage of people can succeed if they start from scratch without any accumulation? From the chicken soup article of individual examples, we can gain some encouragement, but if we want to be impulsive, we are going the wrong way.
As for why young people can choose flexible employment and spend a period of free time, to be honest, it is still because of age, and they have a certain amount of room for trial and error at a young age, which is a natural advantage.
If you succeed, it's good, if you don't succeed, then you work to earn money, they have their own way out, but we don't have such a way out, we are old, we don't have decisive technical means in our hands, how can we start from scratch?
In case of an accident in the middle of the journey, where do you find the family's expenses? This is also the biggest trap of flexible employment, there is no income guarantee, it is completely a day of work, working for oneself, at first glance it sounds very good, but when you actually think about it, you can understand the problem.
If you want to expand the direction of your earnings, as the breadwinner of the family, you can participate in study and training after work, rather than directly and flexibly employed.
The state encourages innovative ideas, and the market trend is also innovation, but this innovation has a threshold, and the development of the times to the present, the space of the basic industry has basically been occupied, and then the development of high-tech fields.
Therefore, when thinking about whether you want to move towards flexible employment, you should first think about whether your technical level and economic vision can support your ideas, and then talk about the courage of supporting the problem.
All in all, for most people, flexible employment is a trap option, and the family is still waiting to operate on their own income, and choosing flexible employment is tantamount to giving up stability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my articles, you can click "Follow" and receive the article push as soon as you become a fan.