laitimes

Is the remarks of the proposed teachers of China University of Geosciences intentional or negligent?

author:Interpreter of human nature

Relations in the China University of Geosciences (Beijing) recruitment again, whether it is a pre-arranged radish a pit, or in line with the procedures of normal recruitment, is a problem that many people are concerned about, in fact, according to the remarks prompt, everyone already knows in their hearts, but this layer of window paper was publicized to pierce.

Is the remarks of the proposed teachers of China University of Geosciences intentional or negligent?

China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Recruitment Announcement Information

According to the recruitment information released by China University of Geosciences (Beijing), a total of eight teachers have been hired, three of whom have nepotistic relationships with the school. Of the 8 teachers, 4 are clearly career editors, 2 are participating editors, and the other two are not marked. Not surprisingly, the three related teachers all entered the career editor, and it was really the first month near the water, no, it was the first career editor.

Is the remarks of the proposed teachers of China University of Geosciences intentional or negligent?

The exposure of this incident is actually a good thing for the whole society, allowing us to confirm the style of painting that we usually can't see. We know that there are many unspoken rules in this society, and the so-called unspoken rules are rules that can only be understood and cannot be spoken, and this kind of unspoken rules often have no real evidence, so that many people have no way to be indignant.

The recruitment information announced by China University of Geosciences (Beijing) has completely exposed this unspoken rule to the sun, so that the majority of netizens have real evidence.

Is the remarks of the proposed teachers of China University of Geosciences intentional or negligent?

The editor believes that there are two possibilities why the remarks of this information were published. One possibility is that the editor in charge of the school's information release has a sense of justice, is not used to these unspoken rules, and dares to expose the facts to the public.

There is also a possibility that the editor of the school is a soy sauce maker, and will only read according to the script, but just regard the release of information as an errand without thinking, so the information referenced within the school is directly taken and released, and the remarks are not deleted. If the sense of justice is excluded, a person who is responsible for the information publisher of the school should delete the remarks information, and of course, it is not excluded that the relevant parties have clear requirements to make the remarks of the information publication clear.

Is the remarks of the proposed teachers of China University of Geosciences intentional or negligent?

In short, the unexpected exposure of the unspoken rules of recruitment made everyone realize the importance of relationships again. At present, the news has caused an uproar, it is estimated that whether it is the editor who released the news with a strong sense of justice or without going through the brain, this editor is estimated to be dealt with internally, and when the problem comes out, someone must take the blame, after all, the person who solves the problem is the easiest way to deal with it.

Read on