On January 8, Beijing time, the CBA officially announced the 2003-2004 regular season MVP and the cumulative contribution value ranking of the best international players (each taking the top 10)
The details are as follows:
Homegrown players:
1. Guangsha team Sun Minghui, cumulative contribution value 7.80;
2. Xinjiang team Abdul Salamu, cumulative contribution value 7.33;
3. Guangsha team Hu Jinqiu, cumulative contribution value 6.86;
4. Liaoning team Zhao Jiwei, cumulative contribution value 6.71;
5. Zhejiang team Wu Qian, cumulative contribution value 6.47;
6. Qingdao team Yang Hansen, cumulative contribution value 6.35;
7. Liaoning team Zhang Zhenlin, cumulative contribution value 5.57;
8. Zhejiang team Yu Jiahao, cumulative contribution value 5.25;
9 Guangzhou team Cui Yongxi, cumulative contribution value 5.23;
10. Xinjiang team Qi Lin, cumulative contribution value 5.04;
External Assistance:
1. Shenzhen team has a cumulative contribution value of 9.35;
2. Nanjing team Blakeney, cumulative contribution value 9.27;
3. Sichuan team Gordon, cumulative contribution value 8.63;
4. Fujian team Jermain, cumulative contribution value 8.42;
5. Qingdao team Powell, cumulative contribution value 8.38;
6. Xinjiang team Jones, cumulative contribution value 8.13;
7. Tianjin team James, cumulative contribution value 8.04;
8. Liaoning team Fogg, cumulative contribution value 7.78;
9. Guangzhou team Moore, cumulative contribution value 6.93;
10. Ningbo team Duosen, cumulative contribution value 6.82;
If this season's regular season is over, then the local player who won this season's regular season MVP is Sun Minghui from the Guangsha team, and the foreign aid is Sallinger from the Shenzhen team.
However, what has caused a lot of controversy among fans is that Sallinger deserves to be elected MVP, but Sun Minghui is almost meaningless.
First of all, the data comparison of the two.
Sun Minghui: Averaged 36.8 minutes per game, contributing 20.7 points, 4.1 rebounds, 11.0 assists and 2.4 steals.
Sallinger: Averaged 26.5 minutes per game, contributing 23.2 points, 12.1 rebounds, 3.6 assists and 1.3 steals.
Due to the restrictions of the league rules, Sallinger's average playing time is more than 10 minutes less than Sun Minghui's, but the data is not worse than Sun Minghui's at all.
Especially in terms of scores, it is nearly 3 points more than Sun Minghui.
That's an exaggeration.
If Sallinger's playing time is as unrestricted as that of a homegrown player, everyone should be able to figure out what level his stats will rise.
In other words, only when you reach that statistic and that level can you be qualified to win the regular season MVP.
However, the CBA is not now, to put it mildly, it is "pulling the general from the seed".
Whoever plays relatively well, then the honor is theirs, and it doesn't look at what level the data itself is.
Therefore, this has caused many regular season MVPs to perform in the playoffs, which has attracted ridicule and ridicule from fans.
Personally, I think that there is no distinction between the so-called local players and foreign aids, since they have come to the CBA to play, they are all players on the same platform.
There are other activities involved in the selection of honors, which should be that the players in each league are eligible to be selected, and then the player with the best statistics is selected according to the rules.
This is the most essential "core" of competitive sports--- fairness.
As well as allowing all players to form a correct upward competitiveness.
Always "split" foreign aid and let a group of local players compete there.
It's easy to see what's worse than you, but it's hard to see what's better than you.
Over time, it's really getting more and more outrageous.
To take the simplest example, take the overall ranking of the score list so far.
At the top of the list is Shanxi's guard Yuan Shuai, who averages 21.2 points per game.
This was followed by Hu Jinqiu's 20.8 points, Lin Wei's 20.7 points and Sun Minghui's 20.7 points.
Well, there are no more local players who average more than 20 points per game, a total of 4.
At this level of scoring, I really don't know what kind of "prosperity" there is in the CBA.
Speaking of which, some fans may say why they only focus on "scoring".
It's actually quite simple.
First of all, through the international competitions in the past few years, we have found one of the most important problems, that is, there is too much lack of players who can score, basketball itself is a game of who scores more, and everything is in vain if you can't get points.
Secondly, the level of the CBA league has also been continuously confirmed to be relatively low, and our local players cannot show "high-level" scoring ability in this category, so it will still be terrible to go to international competitions.
So, don't always say that CBA doesn't have more workout value.
In fact, if you can score more than 30 points per game, then when you go to international competitions, see if the effect is different.
In other words, the "point value" of scoring can be lowered, such as about 25 points per game, so can it be at this level for the whole season or even more than one season.
If you can do that, you will do well in international competitions.
For example, Yi Jianlian and Ding Yanyuhang.
Therefore, it is really not recommended that CBA officials always make this kind of meaningless selection activity, because the awards are really bluffing, but the "core" is so mediocre.
Analyzing it carefully, it really shredded the prosperity of the CBA league in an instant...