It is reported that last week's remarks by Israeli Minister Gvir caused a huge controversy. He openly stated that it was "impossible" for Israel to withdraw its troops, and proposed that in the future Gaza should expel all Palestinian refugees and "relocate" them; because Netanyahu had previously aroused criticism from the outside world for his actions against Gaza, and now this kind of speech that "exposed his ambitions" has brought him a lot of trouble; the US State Department has personally come down and announced that the future of Gaza should belong to Palestine, and Israel has no position to obstruct this matter.
The news mentioned that Gwell had previously made provocative statements saying that he had visited the Temple Mount in Jerusalem in February last year, saying that the Temple Mount was an important place for Israelis and that the Temple Mount was open to all. Subsequently, this act aroused great concern in Islamic countries, and protested against it one after another. Earlier this month, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited the Middle East for the fourth time, and this time the U.S. itinerary included a long list of countries that claimed to be there to "stabilize the situation in the Middle East." However, the stance of the United States on this visit is particularly important to each country.
On the 7th, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken fired a rare firepower and rebuked Israeli officials for their "fanatical and provocative" remarks. Blinken reiterated that the United States opposes forcing Palestinians out of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in response to some recent rumors. He said that the future conflict is slowly decreasing, and that the United Nations should step in to help the people of Gaza return to their homes, "who cannot and must not be forced to leave Gaza." At the time, King Abdullah II of Jordan warned Blinken to his face, reminding him that the continuation of the conflict would have "catastrophic consequences" for Gaza and that the United States must be mindful of how dire the consequences could be.
Some analysts believe that although Blinken's remarks were very intense, the United States did not do anything in the final analysis. And the US wants to hand over the future of Gaza to the United Nations, which is a jaw-dropping proposal – Israel has long ignored the authority of the United Nations, even declaring that Guterres is "sympathetic to Hamas" and refusing to issue visas to UN staff. So it is clear that it is almost impossible for the United Nations to facilitate the return of the Palestinian population to Gaza. However, some media believe that the US side is just cooperating with Israel to show the whole world, and they are playing a fair role, but if they do not interfere in themselves, all of them are empty words.
It is also worth mentioning that the British media also believes that Blinken's visit is "extremely stressful", because the Biden administration is about to start the general election, and he must be responsible for preventing the conflict from spilling over, and he must not show a position of "not supporting Israel", otherwise there will be problems with the votes of ethnic Israelis in the country. But if we stick to our current position, there will be more and more criticisms of the United States. There is a comment on this: "The so-called condemnation is just a double reed, the brutality of this war Israel itself cannot be explained, the United States pretends to distance a little, and wants to avoid being criticized by the whole world like Israel; do not forget that they are the only country in the world that openly sends shells to Israel, and it is very ironic to play the role of a 'justiceist' now." ”