laitimes

Suggesting that Hu Xijin sue Mr. Sun Ning, he said, "The dog said that all the money was not paid."

author:Harbin little cousin

Is the Internet a place outside the law? Today, I saw a celebrity with more than one million followers posting an article scolding people as dogs, and groundlessly speculating about people's high pensions and their children overseas.

If you allow this kind of swearing article to earn traffic fees, the consequences are frightening.

Suggesting that Hu Xijin sue Mr. Sun Ning, he said, "The dog said that all the money was not paid."

As soon as I saw this article, I wondered, this person is so bold, who is scolding.

I searched for remarks that anyone who said that sending money equals not posting. A search turned out to be said by Hu Xijin, and the others found who said it, so this article has reason to believe Hu Xijin who insinuated.

Suggesting that Hu Xijin sue Mr. Sun Ning, he said, "The dog said that all the money was not paid."

Whether the content of what is said is right or not, the benevolent and the wise will see the wise, this is a matter that economists should study, we ordinary people can comment but are not qualified to draw conclusions, even if Hu Xijin is wrong, no one has the right to publicly scold him.

Sun Ning, as a celebrity with more than one million fans, was a little impulsive this time.

Some people say that dogs are friends of human beings, and calling dogs is not a curse, but I think whether it is a curse or not should be judged by the parties and the law.

It is undeniable that this article has caused great reputational damage to Hu Xijin, and the comments of netizens are also directed at Hu Xijin.

Suggesting that Hu Xijin sue Mr. Sun Ning, he said, "The dog said that all the money was not paid."

Putting aside the dog's insult, the rest of the content in the article is also speculation, without evidence, which will inevitably bring reputational damage to the parties.

The dog's pension is astronomical!

How high can it be, at most 15,000, some people 30,000 or 40,000, this is not an astronomical amount, people don't steal or rob it, they get it by their ability, they write manuscripts in the rain of bullets when they are young, and this pension has a clear conscience!

Sun Ning is talking about a high pension, which is suspected of driving the antagonistic emotions of netizens with rhythm, which is really inappropriate.

The various revenues are astronomical, and the traffic earnings are astronomical

As long as it is legal income, it doesn't matter if it's astronomical or not? A penny that is not legal is a sin, and no matter how much it is legal, it doesn't matter.

Talking about traffic income, is it necessary for you and Hu Xijin to laugh at who runs more steps?

Aren't they all traffic meals?

The assets of this life are astronomical

Who is busy all his life is not accumulating assets, ants are like this, bees are like this, and people are even more so.

As long as this is a legal accumulation, is it a shame? Is it illegal? Who doubts Li Ka-shing's accumulated assets?

The assets brought by identity and status, this is the brand effect, provided that the foundation is laid at a young age.

Maybe there are a few houses overseas, and the children are all overseas

I believe that Lao Hu is innocent, and if you don't say a word, you will push people to the crater of public opinion.

Lao Hu once said that he has no land in the United States, and he has not saved a penny, which is theoretically true.

Suggesting that Hu Xijin sue Mr. Sun Ning, he said, "The dog said that all the money was not paid."

On the issue of children, Lao Hu has a daughter who also works in the Global Times, and people work overseas, not to enjoy the scenery.

What is Sun Ning's intention in mentioning this? If you have evidence, you can show it, and questioning without evidence is slander!

Alas, the network has really changed for the sake of traffic, and when biting becomes a traffic password, it is really a sad thing.

As a media person, Hu Xijin says so many things every day, and if he says too much, he will lose, and it is inevitable that he will overturn, but it cannot be denied that he is calm, not extreme, and the general direction is correct.

The Internet should be more tolerant of him, and he can't pick out a word and kill him, this kind of thinking is wrong and terrible!

Disagreement can be debated, attacking and abusive does not prove you right, the point is that it is illegal, and morality does not allow it.

Therefore, it is recommended that Hu Xijin sue the abusive, although he did not name names, but it can be inferred from various information!

Hope for the Internet Civilization Debate!

Read on