Recently, after a Jiangxi student ate a "rat head" in the cafeteria, the subsequent countermeasures have attracted widespread attention. Under the results of the joint investigation team, the relevant schools and enterprises were punished to varying degrees. However, the Jiang Bureau, which is the market regulator, has not taken any measures to hold people accountable, leaving many people angry and confused. After this incident, how to sing the economy and build the confidence of the masses, the regulatory authorities have an unshirkable responsibility.
Review of the rat head duck neck incident
The cause of the incident was that in June, a student in Jiangxi Province was eating in the school cafeteria when he found a picture of a suspected rat head in the neck of a duck, which was exposed on the Internet. As soon as this incident came out, it quickly spread on the Internet and aroused the attention of public opinion. Subsequently, the school involved refuted the rumor that the picture was PS. But the students stood their mind.
Under the pressure of public opinion, schools, enterprises, and market supervision departments conducted joint investigations and evidence collection. Jiang Ju initially said that after comparison, it was indeed a duck neck. However, after examination, it was confirmed that it was indeed a rat's head. Under the results of the joint investigation, the school involved bears the main responsibility, and the enterprise bears direct responsibility, and is punished to varying degrees. However, Jiang Bureau, as the regulatory authority, has not been held accountable, leading to doubts about its regulatory ability.
The Jiang Bureau bears unshirkable supervisory responsibility in the incident
In this case, the Jiang Bureau, as the market supervision department, has a clear responsibility for supervision and management, and there are obviously various problems in its response process: the initial identification error led to the continuous fermentation of the incident and dereliction of duty. A full investigation was carried out under the pressure of public opinion, and the response was slow. After the results of the joint investigation came out, it did not take responsibility for its own inadequate supervision.
There is no comprehensive investigation and rectification of the enterprise to eliminate hidden dangers. Failure to announce follow-up rectification measures to the public, lack of accountability and transparency, failure to actively guide enterprises to improve self-regulation, and single means of supervision. The various responses of the Jiang Bureau in the later stages of the incident have demonstrated the weakness and weakness of the supervisory departments in terms of supervision and management, crisis handling, and other aspects, and their negligence in fulfilling their responsibilities, which can hardly avoid the disappointment of the masses.
There is no accountability action in the Jiang Bureau, and it is difficult to establish the economic confidence of the masses
In this incident, Jiang Bureau, as the market supervision department, not only made repeated mistakes in the handling process, which led to the deterioration of the incident, but also failed to reflect on and hold accountable for its own regulatory failures after the incident, which gave the outside world the impression that its regulatory ability was questionable.
For regulators, reciprocity of rights and responsibilities is a basic requirement. The performance of the Jiang Bureau in this incident will undoubtedly damage the public's recognition of its regulatory authority and affect the establishment of the government's credibility. This will further undermine confidence in the market economic environment.
If there are loopholes in food and drug supervision at the grassroots level, the public will be more worried about regulatory problems in other areas. Regulators must face up to their responsibilities and take strong measures to dispel the doubts of the masses, otherwise it will be extremely difficult to "sing the economy".
Fourth, the economic needs to be actively acted by the regulatory departments to enhance credibility, and in the face of public doubts, how can the regulatory system rebuild social trust? The following suggestions need attention: 1. Adhere to the problem orientation, improve the regulatory rules, and strengthen the construction of the food and drug safety supervision system.
2. Intensify supervision and enforcement, crack down on all kinds of illegal acts, and always maintain a high-pressure situation. 3. Actively disclose law enforcement procedures, accept social oversight, and increase transparency. 4. Actively guide enterprises to improve self-discipline and fulfill social responsibilities.
5. Strengthen professional training and professional ethics education for supervisors, and stick to the bottom line. 6. Clear channels for the expression of public opinion, listen to the voices of the masses, and respond to social concerns. 7. Find the crux of the problem and take effective measures to solve the problem.
Only through active and promising actions can the regulatory authorities re-establish their authority, sing the praises of the economy, and let the masses work with peace of mind, consume with peace of mind, and develop with peace of mind.
In the aftermath of the rat-headed duck-neck incident, the Jiang Bureau has not reflected on its own regulatory failures, which will undoubtedly further undermine public confidence. In order to sing the economy, there must be a regulatory system that coexists with prestige and ability, and has the courage to take responsibility.
It is not enough to justify the problem without taking action, and the regulators must face up to their weaknesses, truly respond to public opinion, and take concrete actions to restore social trust, which is an important cornerstone of economic development.
#文章首发挑战赛#