Recently, a property owner in Hami, Xinjiang, was sued for arrears of property fees for three years, and finally chose to pay with more than 20,000 coins, which sparked heated discussions on the Internet. Five property staff counted for two days, and even more than 200 yuan has not been counted, is this strange way of payment allowed by law to vent reasonably, or is it an improper expression of emotion? Let's take a closer look at the story behind this "coin payment" incident.
An expected "coin offensive"
Disputes between property owners and property owners are not uncommon in real life, but it is rare for this property owner to choose to pay the property fee with two large bags full of coins. It is understood that this is because the owner believes that the property did not properly deal with the water leakage problem in the early stage, which led to the loss of its frozen goods. Although the court finally ruled that the owner needs to pay the property fee, this special payment method is undoubtedly a way for the owner to express his emotions.
The hardship and helplessness of the property
In the face of this sudden "army of coins", the property staff seemed a little caught off guard. Five staff members spent two afternoons still not being able to fully count the strata fees owed. This extreme payment method not only brings practical problems to the property, but also reflects the huge difference between the owner and the property in communication and handling issues.
The definition of law and the reflection of society
This incident is not only a conflict between the owner and the property, but also touches the boundaries of law and morality. Legally, coins are also legal money, and it is understandable for owners to pay with coins. However, at the level of social morality, whether such behavior is appropriate, and whether there should be a more harmonious way to resolve disputes, is worth pondering.
The lesson behind the coin payment
Although this incident has aroused widespread concern in the society because of its particularity, it is not difficult to find the lack of communication between the owner and the property under the surface hustle. In the future, how to establish a more harmonious property service system and effectively alleviate the contradictions between owners and properties is a problem we must face.
The incident of the owner paying with coins is not just a simple "change war", it contains deep-seated social problems behind it. This is not only a challenge for property services, but also a reminder of how to deal with conflicts more effectively in our daily lives to avoid similar situations. We should learn from this incident and encourage owners and property owners to communicate with the property in a more rational way to find a fundamental solution to the problem, so as to create a more harmonious living environment.
Dear readers, what do you think of this kind of payment with coins? How do you think the two parties should communicate effectively when dealing with disputes between property owners and landlords? Feel free to leave your valuable comments and suggestions in the comment area.