Since Comrade Xi Jinping recalled the Fengqiao experience in 2013, one of the most powerful responses has been the "national counter-espionage" mobilized by the Ministry of State Security.
1. Is the Fengqiao experience a mass line or a mass prevention system?
The main point of Fengqiao's experience is to rely on the masses, transform contradictions, and solve them on the spot.
Chairman Mao pointed out: "The most important thing in your Ministry of Public Security is how to do mass work, organize the masses, and educate the masses...... Judging from the experience of Zhuji, after the masses rise up, they will not be worse than you, nor weaker than you, and you should not forget to mobilize the masses. ”
General Secretary Xi Jinping summed it up: "The mass line is the lifeline and fundamental work line of our party."
Some viewpoints go in the opposite direction and are afraid of the mass line, such as the judicial leaders who interpret the Fengqiao experience as a mechanism for preventing petitions, digest contradictions, and regard the masses as the object of prevention, reflecting a kind of bureaucratic dogma.
Once the masses are guarded against, the nature often goes in the opposite direction.
Internet celebrity Hu Da, editor-in-chief, said that the "mobilization of the whole society" is not to become a "mass movement" of "the whole people to catch spies", and they can't wait to directly refute the "national counter-espionage" of the Ministry of State Security, which is really "a toad yawning - what a big breath".
The Dacheng Research Institute's private economy symposium called for the overturning of the definition of exploitation since the founding of the party and the founding of the People's Republic of China, and aimed at the mainstream ideology of the country, and fundamentally rejected the mass line in the name of "populism in society".
2. What is the main contradiction?
In October 2022, the website of the United States Air Force University announced the details of our Rocket Force (the picture above is a screenshot of the machine translation of the download), and the leakage was so thorough that it was probably the most since the founding of the People's Republic of China. Since the Second Artillery Corps has failed to achieve the powerful deterrent power of our army with the blood of the Chinese volunteers and the sweat of the military working class with the "two bombs and one satellite," the US military has finally won a rare opportunity to dare to defy China and alleviate its panic. In connection with the major leaks of Dongfeng 31, the early electromagnetic cannon, and the Taiwan Strait exercise Xi, we must admit that corrupt officials and traitors are the biggest weakness of our army's current combat effectiveness.
What are the reasons for the unprecedentedly fertile soil for the growth of spies since the founding of the People's Republic of China? There are many reasons, which are brief here, but one common problem can be seen: fear of the masses and regard the mass line as ultra-left. After Chairman Mao's death, some people thought that the time to look at the faces of the masses had passed, leaving behind a system of depression.
After the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the "two establishments" were gradually formed, and this process was first of all a process of ideological struggle, a process of contradictory movement between the lifeline of the mass line and the people's face without looking at the faces of the masses, and a process of contradictory movement between the people-centered and money-centered, which constituted different lines, which were the outlines and the main contradictions.
Under this vision, the Ministry of State Security's national counter-espionage has been able to grasp the bull's nose effectively.
3. Who is the most dangerous?
If we say that the "Cai's theory of value" advocates the justification of exploitation and it is not difficult to see its essence clearly, the danger lies in the subjective left-phobia of the editor-in-chief Hu Da and the prevention of mass movements, which represents a typical mindset among the cadre ranks.
Everything in the world, the imbalance is absolute, such as people walking, alternating left and right, the imbalance must be corrected, there is "left" to prevent "left", there is right to right, how to always prevent the rigidity of "left"?
In the vast world, imbalance is absolute, where there is matter, there is movement, movement produces the metabolism of life, and the same is true of the party as the vanguard of the class, how can there be any reason to be afraid of mass movements?
Is it a reflection theory or a transcendental theory? Is there a situation in which counterespionage is used to arrest and beat people indiscriminately, set up private courts, and parade in the streets? The Ministry of State Security has done a good job in proposing counterespionage among the whole people. But as soon as he was worried about human rights, some editors-in-chief Hu Da saw the needles and made a big fuss. Hu carries with him the power of ideological rigidity of the eight forces in the system: if we do not talk about defending against "leftism" and defending against the masses, we will have less right to speak and fewer opportunities to be promoted. Seeing the faces of the masses has passed, and seeing the faces of the superiors has come, which has become the biggest unspoken rule.
Today, on the one hand, spies and traitors are rampant and cannot be prevented, and on the other hand, for example, Tsai's theory holds the US fund in the left hand and the Chinese fund in the right hand. Illegal and legal, covert and open, the function is to dismantle the national constitution, and the biggest protective umbrella is Hu's rigid anti-"leftism", afraid of the masses, especially the influence of capital and left-phobic ideology as Internet celebrities. This is the deep-seated significance of revisiting the experience of Fengqiao in the new era.
Fourth, things will rot and then worms will grow
Obviously, the launch of mass counter-espionage has already hit the opponent's seven inches, but Hu Shi set a framework for guarding against ultra-leftism and mass movements, and only took one step forward and two steps back, but instead sent a sharp weapon to the opponent. They hope that our side will tie up its own hands and feet and correct the Fengqiao experience to guard against the masses. This is precisely what the anti-communist forces in the US government and opposition are trying to do.
It is precisely under the narcotics of Hu's so-called anti-ultra-leftist and anti-mass movements that they can remain defenseless against spies for a long time; the education departments have an ambiguous attitude toward poisonous teaching materials; the judiciary dares to judge and act courageously and justifiably in defense; party schools dare to oppose the party; and officials in Luoning and Wangcheng dare to destroy Mao's ......; Even foreign netizens are criticizing China for pampering the United States for decades for "giant baby disease"; while Americans dare to make naked conspiracy, their senior officials dare to threaten to rely on China's internal forces, and their governments dare to openly allocate funds to cultivate cultural spies.
At that time, Chairman Mao said, "The Communist Manifesto is the policy of unleashing the masses, and the Second International violates this policy, worships spontaneity, and leaves everything to nature." "Counter-espionage, promoting the private economy, and all walks of life still have to rely on the mass line to open up the situation, and they must not hesitate and not hesitate.
One of Lu Xun's last words before his death: Those who damage other people's teeth and eyes, but oppose revenge and advocate tolerance, should never approach him. Today, in the face of hostile forces, those who advocate guarding against the masses first are the obscene villains that Lu Xun warned. It is necessary to counter-espionage, to sweep away anti-drug teaching materials, to revitalize the private economy, and to ...... , first of all, be ideologically wary of Hu and his ilk.
(The author is a special commentator of Kunlunce; source: Kunlunce [original] revised draft, authorized by the author)