laitimes

Modi, who has no confidence to face China, pulled out Nehru, who had been dead for almost 60 years, as a scapegoat

author:Xiao Xin New Entertainment

In today's Indian political scene, there are often fights and attacks against opponents with the help of historical events. Recently, the Indian government seems to be fond of using Nehru, who has been dead for nearly 60 years, as a scapegoat to explain problems and attack opponents when talking about Sino-Indian relations.

Modi, who has no confidence to face China, pulled out Nehru, who had been dead for almost 60 years, as a scapegoat

This incident reflects a number of real and implicit problems:

First of all, political elections are always a lively occasion. In order to attract the support of voters, politicians often use historical events and political figures to attack their opponents. They may even distort history in order to gain an electoral advantage.

Modi, who has no confidence to face China, pulled out Nehru, who had been dead for almost 60 years, as a scapegoat

Nehru holds a special place in Indian history. He was the first Prime Minister of India and had a profound impact on Indian politics. However, as time went on, people began to question his policies and decisions.

In political competition, different political parties will always attack each other, and this competition leads to often aggressive and tendentious political rhetoric, which further complicates the problem.

Modi, who has no confidence to face China, pulled out Nehru, who had been dead for almost 60 years, as a scapegoat

These problems are not confined to India, but are pervasive in the political competition of countries around the world. Politicians use historical events to create buzz and attack their opponents in order to win votes.

However, this practice also raises some deep thoughts. In the political arena, is it to distort history for the purpose of attacking opponents, or is it to better understand and solve the problems of the present? Is this practice of using historical events to truly serve the country and the people, or is it just a trick in the political arena?

Modi, who has no confidence to face China, pulled out Nehru, who had been dead for almost 60 years, as a scapegoat

Perhaps, we need to have a more objective and comprehensive understanding of history. Political elections are short-lived, but history is long-lasting. We should focus more on solving the problems of the moment rather than distorting history for the sake of votes. Politicians should compete in the interests of the country and the people first, not for the purpose of attacking their opponents.

Therefore, we need to pay more attention to the challenges and opportunities of the moment, and make real efforts for the development of the country and the well-being of the people, rather than indulging in political attacks and distorting history. This may be the real political responsibility.

Modi, who has no confidence to face China, pulled out Nehru, who had been dead for almost 60 years, as a scapegoat

Read on